![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,365
|
![]()
From the looks of the butt , this piece IMO has been cut; I was expecting to see a cap or finial for the end.
Is there any wear on the end? As far as the rest of it goes; it looks to be what it is . ![]() ![]() I wouldn't want to try to pin down exactly where in the Archipelago this originated. Good job on the blade. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Thank you Rick.
Yes, you are quite right ... and i was blind. It has all signs of having been sawed off, and not so long ago. By the way, could this be an old piece ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
IMHO I think the length of the haft is good, so I doubt it is shortened. I have two similar lances of the same length if I can judge it correctly.
I think you bought a nice lance from Sumatra. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,894
|
![]()
looks like it is at least from the turn of the 19th/20th century. I like the way the halft has thicker piece glued on. I wonder why the end was cut. So you got at a good price in the end?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,365
|
![]()
Judging from the 'before' pictures I think it is not new.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,894
|
![]()
I will go with Henk and it is possible the end was always like that. Unless a picture show clearly over wise.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Hi Henk
I do think it is visible that the haft was cut shorter, although not necessarily a great length of it. Let's consider for example that its present length is the maximum allowed for postal transportation. I have heard cases where spear hafts are abandoned or cut shorter for such reason. Tim, you make me fear i was blind for the second time with this piece. I was thinking that the haft was a whole cane piece, only with an unusual "jump" between the sections . Now you tell me that actually the sections were loose parts with diferent thicnesses, later put together to form the haft. Quite a bizarre solution, right ? Yes, the price became more favourable, both in amount and currency. I swapped this lance and a vintage book cabinet ( for my daughter ) with two little pistols i wasn't interested on. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Can i call this piece a tombak ?
And the steel forging method, any characteristic name for it, rather than just plain steel ? Thanks for help. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Fernando,
I have such a similar spear haft on a spear. Still I think it isn't shortened with a saw, maybe with a file or something like that to flatten the bottom of the haft. And maybe some less smarter person rubbed with it on a stone. On the picture I wouldn't say it is a fresh saw cut. A saw cut is more smoother and cleaner. http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=1672 Take a look at the third spear. Not a very sharp picture, but you can se that the haft is similar to yours. To call this a tombak? I'm not very sure, but I think a tombak is something different. I would prefer to call it a lance or a spear with a good forged steel blade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|