![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,325
|
![]()
Ariel this is another type of ceremonial Tibetan sword.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,597
|
![]()
It is great to see interest in Indian weapons developing further here on the forum!
![]() In looking at this very interesting piece, the observations on the dorje form pommel are well placed and do of course recall that decorative element on Tibetan ritual items such as the phurba as well as seen on 'parasu' (ritual axe) and 'kartttrika' (ritual chopper). I do believe however that this is an Indian sword and by the hilt, probably either Deccani or Mysori. The blade seems to be of the early khanda type, and the assessment on the date seems reasonably placed c.1800, the blade quite possibly earlier. The hilt of the sword seems characteristically 'atavistic' in line with many Indian weapons, especially those intended for ceremonial or court purposes, recalling decorative dynamics including 'Tantric' elements (as seen on the Tibetan items) as well as the typical architecturally influenced structure. The botanical theme of the lower part of the hilt recalls similar hilt guard form as seen on early Pala swords c.10th-13th century (Rawson pp.2 and 9), and the hilt overall carries subtle similarities to Indian dagger forms such as the chilanum. The hilt on this sword seems to be somewhat associated in style with a number of the forms seen in Robert Elgoods "Hindu Arms and Ritual" though certainly not necessarily by typology as much as by the symbolically structured and brass characteristic. Looks like a great acquisition!! Best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]() Quote:
Jim, Your well thought out and erudite reply has motivated me to post a few Indian pieces. Will do so in other theads. I agree completely with your reply on this great acquisition. Did one of the fourm people win it? Merry Christmas Bill |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,597
|
![]()
Hi Bill,
Thanks very much! Also thank you for the support in furthering our study on Indian weapons, these are so incredibly under researched in most cases. The greatest advance we have had on these has been Robert Elgood's outstanding and seminal work on "Hindu Arms and Ritual". I hope future reference books discussing ethnographic weapons will follow his lead with the excellent perspective he uses so skillfully in the examination and identification of them. Interesting Tibetan items, and great story on the 'worn out' items!! Uh, I'd be happy to take a whole bunch of new shiny stuff over there to trade for all these old worn out things!!!! ![]() Thanks again, and a very Merry Christmas to you as well, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: McDonough, GA
Posts: 48
|
![]()
The same question popped up on SFI last July.
http://forums.swordforum.com/showthr...ight=acalantha I figured it was some type of acalantha remounted as a temple piece. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Not only the same type of sword, it is the same sword!
Look at the forging flaw at the top of the blade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Hi Joe, and welcome to the forum
![]() Thank you for the link, of which I was not aware. The sword is indeed either Nepalese or Tibetan, personally I would vote for Nepalese. The blade could have been rehilted, although I doubt it, as all the blades I have seen of this type were riveted to a reinforcement from the hilt, and this one does not have any holes after having been riveted. This type of blade has been used since ancient times in Nepal, which you can see when studying old Nepalese bronze deities. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|