Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 30th November 2006, 08:48 PM   #1
katana
Member
 
katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
Default

Thankyou Gentleman,
as you can tell British swords are not my forte .
But this 'caught' my eye....I like the idea that a sword may have a story..or two. This seems to fit the 'criteria'.....I feel that the sword hilt was 'modified' to improve its serviceability in the 'field'. But that is just my assumption. I do know that these swords were carried and, sometimes used during the conflict of WW1. I think I am right in saying that the last British Cavalry charge occurred during that terrible war.

Thanks Fernando, I will do some checking on the possible maker....greatly appreciate you finding this out.

As regards 'fencing'.........it certainly has that feel........I've been lunging, sword in hand..to the 'chorus' of 'en guarde' for several minutes......sad..but true
katana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2006, 10:08 PM   #2
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by katana
As regards 'fencing'.........it certainly has that feel........I've been lunging, sword in hand..to the 'chorus' of 'en guarde' for several minutes......sad..but true
Well, that falls again into the fantasy area. Fantasies are vital for one's mental health.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2006, 01:01 AM   #3
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,454
Default

Hi Katana,
As correctly observed by Tim and Fernando, this is a British M1897 sword for Infantry officers, and remained in use for dress occasions through present day. If possible get a close up of the brass 'proof mark' on the blade and this might have a clue to either maker or outfitter. It seems Wilkinson, who made the larger numbers of these often numerically stamped blades, however it seems they would have the name on the blade.

A few notes on British cavalry charges, a favorite subject of mine from many years ago, taken from "Charge to Glory" by James Lunt (1976, p.1)...

"...the charge will always remain the thing in which it will be the cavalrymans pride to die sword in hand".
(Cavalry Journal, 1909)

The author dedicated this book to his friend, Captain Arthur Sandeman, of the Central India Horse, who died March 21,1942 leading the last mounted charge in the history of British cavalry at Toungoo, Burma. He was leading a mounted contingent of the Burma Frontier Force in the defense of areas around Toungoo, the main base for the famed "Flying Tigers" (American Volunteer Group"), when they rode into an ambush. Sandeman instinctively raised his sword and over sixty Indian sowars with him, mostly Sikhs, charged with him into eternity.

You are correct that there was considerable use of swords in WWI, by all countries' forces and such use continued in various degree into WWII.

General George Patton, always the true cavalryman, designed his M1913 cavalry sabre after the straight bladed British M1908, also adding the huge bowl type guard. As the cavalry units were finally dismounted and consigned to being mechanized forces, the use of the sword in combat was virtually finished. Describing these times, General Patton claimed that "...the saddest moment in his life came when he stood at attention, weeping, as his cavalry regiment marched past to stack thier sabres for the last time". ("The Long Gray Line", Atkinson, p.58).

After this, many of the huge hilted sabres were cut down into combat knives at the outset of WWII, with the huge guards providing necessary hand protection in close combat. These became known as 'Anderson stillettos' (for the firm who performed these conversions).

Just a few notes and some unbridled romanticism that seem well placed in response to your views and enjoyment of this sword. While uncertain why the hilt on this has been so modified , there has clearly often been distinct purpose for doing so, however odd it must seem to us now.

In one last note concerning these brave cavalrymen, I once had the honor of visiting a British Brigadier who had served on the Northwest Frontier of India, leading one of the last cavalry charges in those regions near the Khyber Pass in the early 1930's, Brig. Francis Ingall (author of "Last of the Bengal Lancers", Presidio, 1988).
As he talked, showing me the M1912 cavalry sabre he had carried in the charge, he would constantly and wistfully glance at the portrait of his beloved charger, his horse Eagerheart.
We spoke of a very close friend of his, also a cavalryman with the 3rd Indian cavalry, who also served in Burma during WWII, later becoming a General, Major Gen. S.Shahid Hamid. In his book "So They Rode and Fought", General Hamid has inscribed,
"A sharp talwar or sabre, a sharp lance, a sharp pair of spurs,
and above all a good heart"

I will never forget that day, and just wanted to share some of the passion that makes our collecting and study of these weapons so compelling.

All the best,
Jim

Last edited by Jim McDougall; 1st December 2006 at 02:53 AM.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2006, 03:17 AM   #4
Chris Evans
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 685
Default

Hi Jim,

Great and informative post!

I have a 1912 officers model. It is supposed to be an outstanding sword, but to me it feels a bit clumsy, though probably was OK for mounted thrusting use. Once I saw a Indian army version, with a slightly shorter and much lighter blade (troopers issue) and it felt much better. The German WKC rendition also felt better in my hands - It too, had a shorter blade.

Cheers
Chris
Chris Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2006, 03:59 AM   #5
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,454
Default

Hi Chris,
Thank you so much!
I agree, these huge swords certainly were a bit awkward, though there was a lot of fanciful hyperbole about them being the ultimate sword design etc. I had a M1908 once that was great as it was entirely leather covered, hilt and all. It felt heavy and sturdy etc, but as you note, awkward for any sort of movement.
Thanks again,
All the best,
Jim
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2006, 12:29 PM   #6
katana
Member
 
katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
Default

Hi Jim,
thank you for your 'colourful' (colorful ) input , do you know whether hilts were modified for 'field use' ? The cut across the guard has been done very neatly and where it would have connected to the pommel is so well done, that you would never know that it was cut at this point at all. It must have been done a very long time ago ....I am sure it isn't a recent adaption.
katana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2006, 01:29 PM   #7
katana
Member
 
katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
Default

Hi Jim,
I forgot to mention .....the 'proof' mark has the word 'PROVED' arcing around the curve of the circular mark ....in between the P and D is stamped a shape similar to pic below, it is quite worn.....obviously looks to be a crown..
Attached Images
 
katana is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.