![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
Hi Michael I think hilts are age indicators and that all Bayu are Kayan and the note in the catalogue is MAYBE wrong . (not for sure)
Look at these pis you see latok with this handle or mandau Latok handle look like the mandua I put pic on could be same tribe so it is in my opinnion an not an seadayak one.( also blade not curved al sea dayak ones have it ) |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Hi Ben,
I see some similarities in style but still think there are more differences in the handle. Interesting comparison however. On Shelfords mentioning of Bayu as a Seadayak sword I took a closer look at the reference picture. It's not a "proper" Bayu in his article but something closer to the blade of the parang we posted on the recent Sumatra Borneo thread. But with a mandau hilt and a long back edge. Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|