![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Hi Jens
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Hi all, sorry for this question, that could be stupid, but on the fews firangi that i have seen (on this forum, on ebay and on seller's sites) seems always, or in many cases, that he blades are over cleaned: this is due to the age (i mean cleaning through the years), to recent over cleaning or what? also mine shows a over cleaning (see the "running wolf" signs). Thank you
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
Flavio
Yes your blade looks be be a bit over cleaned you can tell by the fullers they have a tired appearance to them but it is still a good sword in good condition. Over cleaning is an occupational hazard that we collectors must deal with. If your sword was all nasty and rusted you may not have bought and on the other hand if it were pristine you would have paid four times as much for it so in this way you have settled for the middle ground. Lew |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Hi Lew,
yes what you say is perfect, but what makes me think is the fact that the blade near the handle (where the two tongues [sorry i don't know the exact term ![]() ![]() p.s. maybe the blade was re-mounted? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
Flavio
One reason why you may see less rust on the langlets is they were made of milder steel with less carbon content. Sword blades would have a higher carbon content there fore they would be more prone to rusting. Another reason is firangi blades if damaged or broken in battle could be easly replaced with a new blade just by punching out the rivet and attaching a new blade. Lew |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Lew,
thank you for the explanation ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|