![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
I say this is more recent post WW2 the hilt just does not look 19th century to me.
Lew Last edited by LOUIEBLADES; 5th October 2006 at 08:42 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
There ia a lot of new stuff coming out off the Asian islands most off the real
old stuff was already taken out off the country long time ago there is still real stuff overthere but not for cheap bargains regards , Ben |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,453
|
![]()
mross:
Impossible to assess the blade for lamination from the pictures provided. It appears to have a coat of varnish over most of it. The leaf-shaped blade may be quite old, possibly late 19th C., but the kakatua hilt looks more recent. If Cato is to be believed, the flat scabbard could be late 19th or early 20th C. but I would not bet on it. Possibly an old barung blade and scabbard with more recent hilt, but the pictures are too poor to really judge this one. Ian. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() Last edited by mross; 5th October 2006 at 09:31 PM. Reason: typo |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|