![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 210
|
![]() Quote:
Unfortunately, that last set, leaves me with the impression that the handle is bone. I see what looks like pores for a vascular system (all of those tiny brown and red specs). n2s |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 10
|
![]()
Just got back in...
One reason why my request may have seemed so guarded is because photography of ivory can be, well, particular. And I have been in contact with eBay sellers, for instance, who have been very defensive about their "ivory." But not2sharp points out what I was wondering about. The cracks were also throwing me off since ivory ages and cracks. But is this due to the metal in the handle? Essentially, when I saw the first set of pictures, I thought, "That is bone." It is not uncommon to mistake ivory for bone. Maybe I can post some very old eBay pictures (a decade old, literally) of objects that are obviously bone but were sold as ivory. Maybe one or two forumites who own similar pieces could shoot a close-up shot or two of his or her handle(s) to offer some comparison. Ivory that ages varies in color, cracks, etc. So while this comparison will not be as much a matter of A = B, it will offer more perspective. A grain should be visible at least, yet whether the camera will capture it or not is another matter. Regardless, the piece looks nice, and that is the point, I suppose (from a collector's perspective, I mean). I would be happy with a piece like that. You could take it to an antique dealer or auction gallery that usually sells ivory, and that person should be able to give you an assessment right away, the benefit being she or he will see the handle up close. This is, of course, only if the handle's material is a concern... Sincerely, Doug M |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
Bill
A real nice dagger. The hilt seems to be bone and not ivory. The way to confirm if it's ivory is to look for the cross hatch matrix in the ivory. If you are really upset about it not being ivory please feel free to send it to me. It will have a good home here in N.J. ![]() Lew |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 210
|
![]() Quote:
Can you post a picture of that "cross hatch matrix"? n2s |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]() Quote:
Lew, In hand, it seems to be ivory. The original seller is Fred Coluzzi and he thinks it is ivory. If it is bone, it has a finer grain than I have seen before. Realize the handle is less than 3/4" in cross section so the pictures are quite an enlargement. But it could be bone. I don't know. It is not a big deal to me one way or the other, I'd just like to know how to better determine what are the differences between bone and ivory and how to tell. Thanks Bill |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
![]()
I think it is bone. At least all of thoose Bosnian bichak I've seen were bone. Also Balkan yataghans, there's always bone and not ivory.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,842
|
![]()
It looks a solid piece, 3/4 inch rather thick for most bone from the animals of the area. The few brown dot are hard to say with certainty blood vessel. It also looks quite fine. It could be from a toothed whale? from the Mediterranean/Black Sea? It does not have the soft look of well handled ivory?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|