Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old Yesterday, 10:23 PM   #11
RobT
Member
 
RobT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 638
Default Close but Worringly Different

Patterson25,

The parrot’s head hilt you show is one of the two things that worry me. Your example is a recognizable type (see the thread recently started by Alex [When it comes to Indian arms - Indian Zoomorphic Daggers). My hilt doesn’t look enough like what you show (or what is shown in Alex’s thread) for me to really be comfortable. One very notable difference is the way the hilt sits in the sheath. Although the hilt and sheath of my dagger fit together snugly and very well, the seating process is different than what is seen on the classic examples. I intend to test for crucible damascus on the outside chance (slim to none) that the blade may be older than the rest of the ensemble, but I have a feeling that the earliest date for my dagger would be just prior to Indian independence (1947) and, given the very good condition of the entire piece), it may be considerably younger than that (which is the second thing that worries me).

Sincerely,
RobT
RobT is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.