Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 2nd March 2026, 08:22 PM   #7
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,209
Default

Detlef, I have no opinion in respect of who might have put it together, none at all, for the simple reason that i have absolutely nothing upon which to base that opinion. To form an opinion, I need evidence, I have none.

However, I do have a picture, & that picture tells me that I'm looking at something that has three or four parts that I have never previously seen combined in a single item.

The blade can be recognised & named, the hilt can be recognised & named, the scabbard appears to have some age and could well have been made for the blade, but can all these parts , assembled as one, be named? To give a name we need a whole group of similar objects that do have a name & a supportable geographic location of origin.

We do not have this.

Then there is the problem of how this implement could be used.

I doubt I would want to use it for anything unless I was wearing a metal mesh glove.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.