|
25th February 2026, 02:45 AM
|
#3 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,818
|
Thank you so much!!!
Looks like the mask is older, 19th c. as was indicated when I acquired it, but may be more to turn of century. As Matt Easton notes, in these periods of fencing face and head were not permitted target. As I recall, when I was involved that was clearly not the case. |
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode