![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,712
|
Ian and Will, thank you guys for detailing criteria on your observations!
This thoughtful effort is how we learn about the weapons we discuss and the character of the elements, decoration and processes that are essential in the forensics process that help us understand them. Just making some declaration or laconic blurb toward a weapon in discussion, as too often apparent in todays devolving communication is less than helpful, so actual imparting of knowledge and experience is pure treasure. Just sayin
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2025
Posts: 6
|
All very interesting and thank you all for your comments.
I have noticed that the quillons of this Tulwar are quite distinctive and very slightly turned down, would anyone know if this was representative of a certain region or time period? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,262
|
I have a similar short, 24 in. blade, NW Indian or AFghan shamshir with a plain all steel grip:
Last edited by kronckew; 25th October 2025 at 02:25 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Eastern Sierra
Posts: 517
|
Chris I really like this sword! When you are tired of it.....
![]() Gentlemen remember different styles of swordsmanship required different types of blades. Here is an overview of technique. Are these videos historically accurate or bushitido? I don't know, but the theories on movement of center of mass presented are sound for what that is worth. https://youtu.be/pLTcVJGMBkQ https://youtu.be/bEr8-O_gZ98 https://youtu.be/G1YqIoIiPqw |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|