Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 1st October 2025, 11:20 AM   #1
tanaruz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 283
Default Kampilan for info

Hi,

From the same source (Maranao keping and Maranao kampilan)comes another kampilan. Comes with a scabbard.

Your valuable insights/info is very much appreciated.

1) Maranao?
2) possible approximate age? or circa

Kind regards

Yves
Attached Images
     
tanaruz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2025, 04:29 PM   #2
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,367
Default

Hi Yves,

Would like to see better pictures from the cleaned sword, details are hardly visible. From which material are the attachments at the handle?

Best regards,
Detlef
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2025, 11:41 AM   #3
GIO
Member
 
GIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 331
Default

The hilt appears reversed
GIO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2025, 12:26 PM   #4
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GIO View Post
The hilt appears reversed
Jep, you are correct!
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 11:42 AM   #5
Ian
Vikingsword Staff
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,483
Default

Hi Yves,

There are several anomalies on this exsample that lead me to think it may not be a Moro piece. The blade may have been made by a Moro panday but the ensemble does not look Moro to me.

The hilt, as already noted, has been reversed. Part of what would usually be the "upper jaw" of the pommel has been broken or removed, and capped with a nailed metal plate. There are similar nailed plates on the sides of the pommel—I think these are atypical for Moro kampilan. Some tufts of goat or horse hair remain on what was once the "lower jaw" of the pommel.

The blade looks shorter than many kampilan (what is the blade length?), which is a feature seen on some Maranao kampilan from the latter half of the 20th C. Sometimes Moro kampilan are dressed in Lumad fashion (usually T'boli or Bagobo), and I have seen some of the recent, shorter kampilan dressed in this manner. The scabbard is reasonably ornate, and unlike usual Moro scabbards although somewhat consistent with the more decorative, late 20th C versions.

Short kampilan-like blades are made by the T'boli and Bagobo groups, but I think this example is probably a Moro blade and not a Lumad blade.

Age is very hard to assess in its present state. After cleaning, it may be easier to assign an age. A cautious estimate at this time would be 20th C.
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 11:52 AM   #6
Ian
Vikingsword Staff
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,483
Default

Hi Yves,

There are several anomalies on this piece that lead me to think it may not be a Moro piece. The blade may have been made by a Moro panday but the ensemble does not look Moro to me.

The hilt, as already noted, has been reversed. Part of what would usually be the "upper jaw" of the pommel has been broken or removed, and capped with a nailed metal plate. There are similar nailed plates on the sides of the pommel—overall, I think these are atypical features for a Moro kampilan. Some tufts of goat or horse hair remain on what was once the "lower jaw" of the pommel.

The blade looks shorter than many kampilan (what is the blade length?), which is a feature seen on some Maranao kampilan from the second half of the 20th C. Sometimes Moro kampilan are dressed in Lumad fashion (usually T'boli or Bagobo), and I have seen some of the recent, shorter kampilan dressed in this manner.

Short kampilan-like blades are made by the T'boli and Bagobo groups, but I think this example is probably a Moro blade and not a Lumad blade.

Age is very hard to assess in its present state. After cleaning, it may be easier to assign an age. A cautious estimate at this time would be 20th C.
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.