![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,290
|
![]() Quote:
Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: City by the Black Sea
Posts: 275
|
![]() Quote:
I've had this knife for quite a long time, and I didn't pay attention to these nuances. But now I looked closely, and there really are traces of wire on the handle. Live and learn, but you will still die a fool (Russian humorous proverb). ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,290
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Best regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,290
|
![]()
These both will enter the small collection soon.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,711
|
![]()
Detlef, you have done a much better job collecting these than me. Claude writes that the khodmi hilt is split to allow the tang to be inserted, and therefore the wiring is necessary to hold everything in place. On Yuri's example the hilt construction is in between the two types, with horn scales riveted together instead of a single piece of horn. Thus, less wire was needed at only a couple of spots, as opposed to half the hilt. On mine, the hilt is made of a single piece of horn and the wiring is so extensive that it even covers the hole for the lanyard in the middle of the grip.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,290
|
![]()
The one from my collection with the bone handle has a very similar construction as the one from Yuri where some of the wire binding got lost like Yuri confirmed. I am nearly sure that my one has two rivets under the wire binding also, I have seen some of these knives where the wire binding was opened or lost, all had the same construction like we see it in Yuri's example.
I hope Khaled (Fennec) sees this thread and will be able to tell us more. In my opinion the wire binding is only a reinforcing. Regards, Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|