![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
![]()
... a continuation of what BSMStar was saying (more of a full circle):
Quote:
a recent excerpt from the latest edition of American Rifleman magazine, NRA's 'Official Journal' (July 2006). the article was written by Wiley Clapp, field editor. Back To the Future? U.S. Military .45s, pp.36-37 "We have come to understand the flawed logic of selecting a high-capacity 9mm pistol, simply because it holds lots of shots. Even the .40 S&W compromise, which gives us fewer shots and bigger bullets than the 9mm, has not always worked well as it should. The best solution to the problem would seem to be the one adopted in 1911 - a .45 ACP handgun. Any student of firearm history is aware of the fact that we have been through this before and for exactly the same reasons. We once change from a single-action .45 Colt revolver of adequate power to a .38 Long Colt revolver of inadequate power, just because the latter was lighter, more modern double-action design. When the .38 Long Colt faced a determined enemy in the Philippines, it didn't performed well, and we ended up rushing the older .45 Colt guns out of arsenal storage and into the hands of the troops. Then, a program of development was initiated that resulted in the best service pistol and service pistol cartridge in the history of arms. The M1911 Colt in .45 ACP served us well in two world wars, Korea, Vietnam and other conflicts throughout the troubled 20th century." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]() Quote:
(i am prejudiced because the few times i went armed for real i used a .45 govt. model, and got my expert pistol medal with one...) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I would love to debate the differences but I do not wish to hijack this thread. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
you can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink. some dead horses like beating also. the thread has been hijacked already by picking up and disagreeing with what was meant to be a marginal aside on my original discussion of the 'terminal ballistics' of moro edged weapons against US troops. i offer the following to try to terminate this discussion as i do not want anyone left with incomplete facts.
those who have been a gun nut or been involved in hand loading & Terminal Ballistics (linky) will see my point. if i'd a said 9mm parabellum cartridge and/or .38 long colt, .38 special, etc. you might have a leg to stand on, but talking about bullet diameter there is no practical difference and they are in the same family, and the effect on a target especially will be very closely the same given the same construction, velocity and bullet weight. the 9mm is classed as a .38 caliber weapon, 9mm is just the european measurement for what is called a .38 in the US (actually .36, but called .38 for reasons not germain) the .002 inch difference in diameter only matters to handloaders, again, some 9mm weapons actually have .357 bores & may be more accurate with .357 hand loads in their 9mm parabellum cases. i won't get into mfg. tolerances, wear, rifling differences and their effects on bore dia. either. the above linky on terminal ballistics has more info than can be adequately covered here for anyone who wants to continue.. so, anyone who is chambering a 9mm parabellum cartridge IS effectively chambering a .38 caliber bullet. Last edited by kronckew; 10th July 2006 at 07:50 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Makassar, (Ujung Pandang), Sulawesi, Indonesia
Posts: 38
|
![]()
This is our longest keris. It is 148 cm long to end of peksi. It has 21 luk. Most luk we have seen in old keris. The blade weighs 1.5 kilo and it has a very nice belalai gajah and good pamor. We think this keris from east Java maybe Madura. This keris just for ceremony. This keris I gave my son when 21 who holds it now for you.
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-...aduraBagus.jpg This keris next was belong by Pak Ida Bagus Dibia in Bali. It is from Madura and about 150 cm long. http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-...isPakDibia.jpg |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
Wow! Keris used by giants...
![]() Mudi, are you the one holding the 1st keris? The 2nd keris, the one holding it, Isn't that the author of Keris Bali/Balinese Keris? Interesting... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Makassar, (Ujung Pandang), Sulawesi, Indonesia
Posts: 38
|
![]()
Holding first keris is my son Jonny. He is 27. I am 58. Yes, Pak Dibia wrote the book Keris Bali. I knew him in Denpasar some years ago, but I think he is dead now, or someone told me. He was Ida Bagus or high caste.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|