![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,417
|
Quote:
Your second keris I like much more than the other one! When you are used to working with wood it will be an easy project for you to give it a new gandar. Be very careful with the pendok, the material looks very thin to my eyes. It's not the best pendok I've seen of this type but a good one and worth restoration. The complete keris is a gayaman keris in Jogya style, blade is dapur tilam upih and the pamor is nice, maybe batu lapak, surely worth getting a new stain. Nice keris and I am curious to see it restored. This will be a very nice keris for every collection IMVHO. Regards, Detlef |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 132
|
Hello Detlef,
thank you for the message and hope you had a gute rutsch ins neue jahr too. I don't see any problems creating a gandar ain't a difficult task for me. Will search for some djati sapwood as i don't want to use European or African wood for this. Will post pictures as soon as i start with the project. Best wishes, Martin |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 132
|
Hi all,
I cleaned my Keris from the dammar varnish today and this is how it looks now I took some images from the wilah. I also had in my spare parts a nice old silvered pendok for it. The pamor is it Batu lupak or is it pamor kul buntet? I am trying to identify it but it’s difficult for me. Hope some of the experts can tell me more. Regards, Martin. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
I believe most people would classify the pamor in the sorsoran as Kul Buntet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
It doesn't look inserted to me, Alan.
To me, this motif at the base seems to be a part of the overall pamor (with much of it now lost to erosion). Regards, Kai |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 132
|
The photo’s after taking off the dammar varnish
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
I tend to disagree Kai, erosion and the necessary coldwork has taken a part of the swirl, I feel that this swirl might be continued into the pesi, & and if that is so, then that pesi will have been attached to the blade after the body of the blade had been forged, however, this is just a possibility being floated, because we cannot know that without seeing the pesi, especially under the gonjo.
In any case, whether the kul buntet was inserted as a swirl, or whether the maker was sufficiently skilled to create a swirl in one part of a larger motif, the end result is still the same:- kul buntet. If it is a part of a larger motif, is that larger motif mlumah or miring? Incidentally, on the subject of "insertion" of a pamor feature, in some cases we can form a hole, or even an impression in the material, & then lay the swirl or whatever into it, but it is also sufficient just to lay the additional piece of pamor onto the already forged material, then cover it with another piece of material that gets removed during the cold work. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 132
|
Detail of the pendok as replacement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,250
|
The replacement pendok looks good Martin, though i do believe with just a little bit of effort you could restore the original one to a fairly decent condition.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|