![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 29
|
![]()
I am not going for the lathe idea the carving must mean something to them .Even modern knobkerries are hand carved .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
|
![]()
I'm not arguing that the carvings are meaningless. I am saying that the heads on these club heads do not appear to be carved into a botanical pattern. I'm puzzled by the dimple at the top of the head. There are three reasons that I can think of for such a dimple:
1) it's artistic (always possible, but it can be a fancy way of saying "I don't know, but it must have been put there for a reason"). 2) the tree these came from has a central pith (like a walnut), and the central pit is an unavoidable remnant of that pith. I've got a number of walnut walking sticks, harvested locally, and the central pith doesn't particularly look like the dimples on these clubs. It's not impossible, just unlikely IMHO. 3) it's a result of the manufacturing process, suggesting that the club was turned on a lathe (either spring-cranked or machine). I agree that this is explanation works better for the shaft than the head, but it's still my favorite. F |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|