![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,269
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, it's a wengkon pamor but like you I can't name the inner pamor. I have a fondness for pelet wrongkos and I am glad that the restoration of the atasan is coming out quite good. And like said, the hilt was the main reason that I have acquired the neglected keris. The mendak seems to be from brass or copper and was once silver plated I guess and coming from my stock. Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,228
|
![]()
The color definitely makes it look more copper than brass. I have a selut of one of my collection that is copper that was once silver plated so this seems very likely.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,047
|
![]()
I'd give that inner pamor as ngulit semangko, so: ngulit semangko wengkon
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,269
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,228
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,047
|
![]()
Wos wutah & ngulit/kulit semangka are both simple random pamors.
WW can have many layers of contrasting material, and during the process of making there can be surface manipulation. NS has far fewer layers of pamor, and there is no surface manipulation. The end result for WW can be a tightly packed, random pattern. The end result for NS has far fewer layers of contrasting material, the naturally occurring indentations during forging result in exposure of contrasting material when the cold work is done. So, with these simple, random pamors you don't really have a lot of choices, if in doubt you just run through your possibles and eliminate one by one, if you've seen a lot of NS examples, or WW examples one glance is normally sufficient. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|