![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 343
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 120
|
![]()
I had a 1796 HCS by Woolley which had a crown / 12 inspection stamp.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 343
|
![]()
Thanks Triarii, great post!
Woolley definitely made 1804s so that confirms the stamp on the cutlass. It may even be the same stamp as the serif at the top of the numeral one is missing or feint on both blades. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,191
|
![]()
While we have been focused on naval references here obviously, this M1796 blade with crown over 12 is interesting so checked Robson (1975).
On p.191: It is noted that from 1796 + swords from whatever source were inspected for quality at the Tower, and these view marks began to appear, initially a crown over single number, on the 1796 swords it notes these were not always discernible. In 1820 the govt. view marks added a letter between the crown and inspectors number, i.e. B=Birmingham, E=Enfield, The example in Robson uses this configuration : crown E 13 So I wonder if the 12 might suggest later mfg. as the 13 coincides with the 1820 beginning of use of the letter designator. David, thank you ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 264
|
![]() Quote:
They first went to Gijon and then to Santoņa. A couple of days later a strong French division arrived and they reembarked. it was October, not July, and the weather was poor. Carlos Martinez Valverde, La Marina en la Guerra de Independencia, which I do not own. Possibly Julian Corbett has something on this |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|