![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,989
|
![]()
Sid, I always try to be very conservative with age estimates.
I gave my age estimate as pre-1850, not circa 1850. I based that age estimate on the overall style & appearance of the blade, not upon any blade classification. I was trying to be realistic. If you want a tangguh belief system estimate of age, well then, Tuban-Mataram means anytime from the beginning of the second kingdom of Mataram through to the 19th century, however, I believe most True Believers in Tangguh infallibility would probably place this blade into pre-1800 at least. Sid, the Tangguh System is not at all easy to understand, it can assist with age estimates when very high quality blades in very good condition are involved, the nearer we come to the present time, the more those estimates might be accurate, but most of the time with more humble blades, tangguh is a classification based upon style, and that style relates more to geographic point of origin than era. The True Believers will tell you I'm talking through the top of my head. My own teacher would tell you I'm talking through the top of my head. Maybe I am. You make up your own mind. It all comes down to whether we want an age estimate based upon reality & experience, or if we want an age estimate based upon belief. Incidentally, Pajajaran is another good possibility, but I'm looking at a screen image, I do not have it in my hand, and I would need it in my hand before I'd place a bet on the Pajajaran horse. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 207
|
![]()
Thanks Alan
I dont know what Pajajaran means but assume its also a time period? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,989
|
![]()
In Central Javanese keris belief of the1980's -'90's Pajajaran I was a a West Javanese (Sunda) kingdom that existed approximately concurrent with Majapahit.
That kingdom gave its name to a West Jawa era, and then a keris tangguh classification of Pajajaran I, Pajajaran II & Pajajaran III. Somebody who absolutely believes that the tangguh belief system indicates a time period will also believe that a keris blade classifiable as "Pajajaran" dates from the era of historic Pajajaran. This is what I was taught, and in the presence of my teachers and other True Believers, I also believed this, and in the presence of any True Believers today I am quite prepared to believe the same thing:- at home, in my village, I believe the same things my grandfather believes. Never argue with Granpa. However, realistically these very old tangguh classifications are stylistically based, and a keris blade of that style will in most cases originate in the geographic area related to the name of the ancient historic political entity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakuan_Pajajaran |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 207
|
![]()
Ok. So you could have a Pajajaran era styled blade that is made in more recent times or at least later than the time period of the Pajajaran era?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,989
|
![]()
Yes.
That is the reason why I always date conservatively, especially from photographs and screen images. If a very experienced keris person, whether dealer or collector or student, handles a keris, and if he can keep it for a few days he might be able to give it a more precise date, maybe within , say, 100 years or so with older items, but from pictures & screen images there is no possibility of getting feedback, nor of doing the very detailed examination necessary to form a solid opinion. With this keris, one thing that is very indicative of Pajajaran is the material, but we need a lot more than that. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|