![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,459
|
![]() Quote:
Radboud, thank you for the entry on these assemblies of weapons which were apparently cased for these kinds of supply to private firms for guard purposes. The company of James Wooley and William Sargent seem to have paired using that name in several date periods; 1815-17, 1821-25 and 1826-31, all at 74 Edmund st. It seems that other partners came and went with them in these periods, but arms marked Wooley & Sargent would be in the periods noted. Apparently there was another variant of this hilt with a kind of added bar to the guard, same ribbed grip to the Medical Staff Corps as Pattern 1861. These kinds of swords were similar to Coast Guard types, and again to infantry drummers 1822-1856 (Robson, 1975, p.163). It seems that when the infantry drummers got a new type sword pattern in 1856, the existing swords became surplus and were then given to the medical corps. It would appear that much of the conundrum with these distinctly recognizable iron rib grip, brass hilt swords is that they seem to be rather 'off reckoning' types outside regulation patterns which were present over decades from early years of 19th c. Their presence within military corps and special units as well as maritime as well as private and civil services renders them pretty hard to classify specifically. I suppose in many, if not most cases, it will suffice to place them in the 'of the type' category when aligning them with discussion of certain of the many contexts they have been associated with. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 589
|
![]()
It seems somewhat odd that maritime users in particular would choose a rust-prone steel grip as opposed to brass, particularly since the guard is brass. Was that a matter of cost, taste, or something else?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,459
|
![]()
It was easy to make, cheap and heavily japanned (painted black). Brass was of course also easy to cast and even more durable as far as rusting issues.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,184
|
![]() Quote:
As Jim pointed out, these swords seem to have made the rounds! In Annis' 'Naval Swords', we see that East India Dock Co sword with the corrugated iron grip just like these other examples. It makes sense that these para-military type swords would have appealed to the maritime market (i.e. private purchase), as they were cheap to make and simple in their construction. I wouldn't mind adding one to my collection if it at least had a tentative possible use of being naval (as the example I listed above, with the straight-bladed m1804 blade). Radboud, thanks for posting that weapons locker. That was indeed the one shown in Gilkerson's volume. Last edited by M ELEY; 18th December 2022 at 11:46 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|