The achang dha

[JeffS]

Thanks for that. Here is my example.

[RobT]

Hi All,

I have a dha that had a label on the sheath which said, "KACHIN 1945". The hilt of my dha (which is all copper) matches JBG163's example very closely but the sheath looks like a typical Shan or Kachin dha sheath. According to Wikipedia, there are Achang living in the Kachin State where they are known as Ngochang. Perhaps whoever collected my blade got it from an Achang living in a Kachin area and assumed that the owner was Kachin? Or Perhaps a Kachin obtained the blade from an Achang and had a new sheath made for it? Because of the sun stamp by the hilt, I had always assumed the blade was of Husa manufacture but the same Wikipedia article mentions a group of Achang that call themselves Husa Achang. Could my sword have been of Husa Achang manufacture for the Kachin market? The blade of my dha has a peaked spine, hua tat, and measures 22-1/8" (56.1975cm) long.

Sincerely,
RobT

[JeffS]

Originally Posted by RobT

Hi All,

ICould my sword have been of Husa Achang manufacture for the Kachin market? The blade of my dha has a peaked spine, hua tat, and measures 22-1/8" (56.1975cm) long.

Sincerely,
RobT

My blade has very fine hairpin lamination (pic below), and I understand that is a known characteristic of Kachin sword dao. Do you see this on your blade? Husa is a village (area) that is ethnically Achang and from what I have read on this forum, supplied weapons for many different ethnic groups. I also read they attribute their swordmaking history and other distinctive traditions to Han Chinese from the Ming army who stayed behind (1400's) and married into the Husa Achang community. I think it is cool that you can find Husa swords being made and sold on Ebay that look to be very high quality (though modern designs) with distinctive hamon. I also understand the village still produces traditional sword dao with the scrollwork open scabbards.

[JBG163]

Hi Rob and Jeff
Rob, in my opinion, your sword is a shan dha from burma.
Jeff, blade is almost the same on our swords. Quench line start the same way and the thin lamination with hairpin pattern are identical. They were great craftsmen !

[kronckew]

Although made in Yunnan, that pretty much all of these swords with this typical silver dress hilt are those made for the Kachin and Rawang Kachin , Nung Kachin,, ot branches of the Lisu peoplei n Burma and Yunnan north Thailand, in short they were made by the Yunnanese but for many peoples in both Burma and Yunnan. Other tribes who used such swords were the Chins.


The Husa Achang are also makers of many swords and working tools for the Kachin and even the Shans today, so it really is hard to say who in tribal origin race or region would have used this, Kachin dao, would still be the best way to explain this and its origin.


See also: https://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?p=265678

[JBG163]

Its an interesting response Kronckew.
The amount of informations about those swords is quite low.
But we know that the Achang produced swords for several ethnic groups.

Now, that specific type have specials features différent than the other one produced : open work panel or simple panel.

Were they used by the achang themselves or sold to the kachin and Singpo neighbours ?

I didnt found any informations for now

[RobT]

JeffS,

Although I have eight dha that I consider most likely to be Kachin (either because of the tip [hua tat or hua tat kong] or the style of the hilt), none of them have a tweezer weld. Also, none of them are in fine enough polish to show whether they have had differential edge heat treatment or not.

JBG163,

You identify my sword as Shan and you may be correct but it was labeled "Kachin 1945" so something must have caused it to be so designated and, as kronckew pointed out, ascribing dha from this area to one ethnic group or another can be dicey.

Sincerely,
RobT