Kaskara & Takouba "Enigmatic" Mark Revisited

[Edster]

Jim,

Thanks for your summary and astute analysis of the Cross of Agadez. However I'd like to offer another perspective.

From Briggs' Plate XX, B. are marks from the sword of Adembar said to be copied from A, that of the sword of Raidera. That statement can be challenged.

All of A's marks appear to be like those STAMPED into other blades. The top two (lion & cross) in B would be STAMPED as well, but the bottom left (our Mark) is likely ENGRAVED as may be the one on the right.

B is the only takouba I know of with the Mark. All others shown on the attached threads are Engraved on kaskara, likely trade blades and are virtual duplicates of Adembar's design, and not derivates of any stamp on Raidera's sword.

It would be great to do a hands-on inspection of both swords or at least in figures in Gabus' book to confirm my Stamp vs. Engraved assertion.

Also, the symbol on your Bega kaskara is looks like the "fly" mark and is Stamped. I do like its cross-guard that may have spot welded langets; an interesting variation.

Best regards,
Ed

[Jim McDougall]

Thanks Ed,
As you note, Briggs asserts (per Gaus '58) that the grouping of marks on the 'takouba' of the Tiounfara chief Adembar (XXb) are copied from those on the blade of the takouba of the chief Raidera in Air (XXa).

As also noted, in example (a) those markings are all stamped, thus are more clearly represented, particularly the 'bees' which seem to be more 'tentacled' figures, though Briggs suggests these may represent the German marks used by Kull and Weyersberg as well as Mumm (who termed it 'die puppe;, the doll).

Clearly the marks on (b) are engraved or scribed rather than stamped, which leads to the apparent 'license' of the native artist with the two 'bee' markings while the lion and cross and orb are fairly true to form.
This begs the question, why, if the stamped marks of lion and cross/orb are indeed copied............why the 'interpretation' of the other two?

As you note, in XX(a) and (b) the marking grouping are basically the same, four figures, and are indeed of Tuareg provenance on takouba's.

However, in the same plate, XX(c) is a blade with the same curious engraved figure(s) as seen on sword (b), which as you note is a takouba.
On p.84, Briggs describes the sword in (c) which belonged to Rabadine , a noble of the Kel Rela tribe of Ahaggar Tuareg. Here Briggs describes the blade of this sword (which is hilted as central type takouba, as he notes compares to his takouba example T2).
As seen in (c) the blade figures are clearly like those on (b) Adembars sword, which here Briggs notes these marks are unlike anything he has seen EXCEPT the 'bee' marks on the Adembar sword, and here he notes these engraved hatched marks appear to be placed over older European ones (?).

Here I would note T2 example Briggs refers to in comparing the blade of the (c)sword, is actually what seems perhaps a kaskara blade, as its length is over 35", far loo long for most takouba I have seen, but definitely concurs with kaskara.


So then, example (c) which has the enigmatic markings compared to those of (b), with both swords being takouba as far as the hilts they are mounted in.

On p.81, a confusing description of another example of this 'enigmatic' apparently engraved marking is illustrated by Morel ('43, p.152 'Planche XIV, and '48 p.233, fig. 1). who saw it in AHAGGAR on another sword which belonged to Mohamed bin Sheikh.
So here the implication of a third takouba with the enigma.

Thank you for the kind notes on my kaskara with the rather horned looking stamp. It was suggested that this sword may have had connections to the holdings of Ali Dinar in Darfur (d. 1914) and the references in Reed (1985) seem to support the Darfur note. However, with the rather optimistic suggestion to the Ali Dinar connection I remain skeptical despite the fact he likely had numerous swords. It has been suggested that the styling of these hilts was favored in this time, and these became the 'Kassala' form.

[Jim McDougall]

In going through old notes etc. from what I realize now were from some years ago (where has the time gone?) I found another theory I had come up with but which seemed somewhat tenuous, despite the compelling visual image of the images I found.
I discovered that in ancient Egyptian iconography, in heiroglyphic character for a pharoah named King Narmer, the rebus included a catfish to say his name.
This figure was with a body with forward projecting barbels (tentacles) in the same configuration as this stylized figure of the enigma.

While obviously it seems beyond unlikely that such iconography would lend to the tribal symbolism of relatively modern tribal symbolism of the latter 19th c., I have found a degree of the presence of heiroglyphics being recognized as sources. This was found in references of cattle brands used in Kordofan which could be sourced relatively to heiroglyphics. It seems possible of course that the influence was broader.

We know that various birds, fish, snakes etc. are depicted symbolically on edged weapons in Sudan and into other regions, so I was thinking, perhaps the catfish might have carried the same impact on modern natives that it had on the ancients, regardless of linear chronology. We know that the crocodile did.

At about the time I was considering this, there was a suggestion that this enigmatic figure might have related to the comet, in view if the observance of that cosmology in Mahdist times. This too sounded compelling, but would seem to be more in accord with kaskara and outside the Tuareg connections.

So I thought I would add this 'catfish' aspect as far as possible symbolism for review and further consideration or disqualification. You must admit looking at the rebus with the catfish figure has a compelling similarity from the stylized point of view.

The serekh (rectangular cartouche) with the catfish image is topped with the Horus bird to indicate this rebus is a royal name.

[Jim McDougall]

To follow up on my idea regarding the 'cross of Agadez', in doing more looking into this, I found the following.
The 'cross of Agadez' is in effect an item of jewelry, primarily a pendant with symbolic shapes in silhouette, and the term 'cross' is misleading as there are varying shapes. These items are termed tanaghiit or talhakim and favored by Sunni Muslim Tuareg people.

It seems that whatever the extent of use of these were in the 19th century, in modern times they are somewhat prevalent in the Kel Air; Kel Geress and a number of non Berber groups in the Sahara, which interestingly include the Hausa. However it is noted that these are largely ignored by the larger spectrum of Tuareg people. Perhaps this attitude is what has rendered these 'enigma' markings so rare and unknown, being established and occurring only on a few examples , those copied without broader established meaning or use.

The Hausa are as mentioned, a nomadic tribe originally from Niger, who are known for blacksmithing skills, thus sword production. The Kel Air (Kel Ayr) are the tribe mentioned in previous post with a takouba with this enigma symbol.

While these 'crosses' seem to have wide variation, there seems to be only vague explanation for the symbolism attached to them, so it is not surprising that there is a notable scope of variation in the items physically.

As a reminder, the regions of the Air (ayr) massif are in Niger, which is where the Kel Ayr tribe of Tuareg Berber confederations are situated (in control there since 1850s) and where the 1916-17 rebellions took place. Here is where at least two (perhaps a third) takouba belonging to chiefs and important figures were taken, having these enigma symbols engraved on the blades.
If the widely geometrically varied 'Agadez cross' (from this key city in Ayr) are known there so well, then perhaps similarly styled symbolism might have developed this design, with or without the 'bee' figures in mind. With the trade and tribal interaction with the Hausa as conduit, it seems this may explain how the symbol transmitted into the sphere of the kaskara. All of this probably occurring in the early years of the 20th century.

The talismanic symbolism on Berber weaponry is probably best exemplified in that found on the blades of the Kabyle flyssa, where such symbolic characters are often included in the context of the typically known designs.
Such personalization seems well known among Berber tribes, but in this case such a symbol might have been seen and favored, then copied with whatever imbuement might have been implied or presumed, thus occurring on numerous blades accordingly.

[Edster]

Sorry, Jim, but I can't warm to the Cross of Agadez as being the stylistic parent of The Mark. The Mark is too sophisticated to be its derivative.

While the Cross was relevant to the Tuareg people, it was likely meaningless to the Sudanese, the source on most of our Marked kaskara. Also, the Mark appears exclusively ?? on imported German trade blades so Hausa smiths likely would have had no contact with them, and the Mark was skillfully engraved likely by a silversmith, not a blade maker.

My best origin story is the Enigma mark is the emblem of a sufi order/tariga common among the Tuareg and Sudanese of the Nile Valley. The emblem would be known among silversmiths of both areas so that it could be reproduced virtually identically over a wide geography. Maybe the Qadiriyya, active in Morocco and the first sufi order in Sudan. The link shows their emblem.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qadiriyya

[Jim McDougall]

Points well taken Ed, and I agree your suggestion of this Sufi order being a good possibility of being the source, especially with the notable commonality which would support its diffusion from Tuareg to the Sudanese. I had not been aware of this, and now seeing it is compelling.

As I had admitted in my observations on the cross, it seemed to have a degree of plausibility because of the variations in these and notable stylizing of the enigma. However, this suggestion is markedly more on target both in general appearance and feasibility.

My only question would be, if this symbol in its stylized form as seen on these two or three blades, why would this interpretation exist only on these few examples if it was being reproduced over wide geographical area?

[Edster]

My only guess about limited distribution would be sample size. EAA collectors have identified several (identified in the various threads) and I don't know how many kaskara or takouba are in the hands of our members, others and museums Also, the Mark may have only been engraved on the swords of higher ranking members of the sufi order, those who have attained a higher order of adeptness and not rank and file member.

Hopefully, other collectors will more closely examine their kaskara and other North African swords more closely for the famous mark.