Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12th July 2022, 11:35 PM   #1
werecow
Member
 
werecow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 553
Default

Maybe number 89 or 90 (Sebastian Hernandez)? Although it almost looks like a mirror image. Could the phone have flipped the image perhaps?


Last edited by werecow; 13th July 2022 at 01:09 AM. Reason: Added a thought and an image
werecow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2022, 11:00 AM   #2
Triarii
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 120
Default

Not sure why they came out so large. They're clearer at a smaller scale like the attachment.
Attached Files
File Type: doc Pappenheimer blade stamps.doc (176.5 KB, 1315 views)
Triarii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2022, 03:16 PM   #3
Triarii
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 120
Thumbs up

Werecow, the photos are the right way around.

However, although annoyingly I can't get as good a photo as the Mk1 eyeball;
  1. In the bright sun today (makes a change) the circular blob at the top of the shield clearly has a small cross in it.
  2. The crown is clearly visible below that and has multiple points around its top.
  3. However, below is a reversed 3.
.

So possibly 89, so possibly Sebastian Hernandez. The text below for No 89 (el viejo Vivia) translates as "the old man lived 1637". I'm not sure if that means 'was active around 1637' or died 1637.
That aligns with the hilt type.

The text for No 90 (el mozo labro tambien en sevilla) translates as "the young man also worked in Seville". Presumably his earlier mark.

Thanks Werecow - I'll look at my other lists of marks to check.
Triarii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2022, 05:40 PM   #4
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Triarii View Post
... I'm not sure if that means 'was active around 1637' or died 1637...
Means that there are (written) records of him being alive (at least) in that date.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2022, 05:54 PM   #5
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Like so ...


.
Attached Images
 
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2022, 03:18 AM   #6
werecow
Member
 
werecow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 553
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Triarii View Post
Werecow, the photos are the right way around.

However, although annoyingly I can't get as good a photo as the Mk1 eyeball;
  1. In the bright sun today (makes a change) the circular blob at the top of the shield clearly has a small cross in it.
  2. The crown is clearly visible below that and has multiple points around its top.
  3. However, below is a reversed 3.
.

So possibly 89, so possibly Sebastian Hernandez. The text below for No 89 (el viejo Vivia) translates as "the old man lived 1637". I'm not sure if that means 'was active around 1637' or died 1637.
That aligns with the hilt type.

The text for No 90 (el mozo labro tambien en sevilla) translates as "the young man also worked in Seville". Presumably his earlier mark.

Thanks Werecow - I'll look at my other lists of marks to check.
I think the "3" in numbers 89 / 90 are a gothic stylized "z", but it's odd that it would be mirrored. Maybe it's a C and the bar at the top of the "3" is just the bottom of the crown?
werecow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2022, 01:14 PM   #7
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by werecow View Post
I think the "3" in numbers 89 / 90 are a gothic stylized "z", but it's odd that it would be mirrored. Maybe it's a C and the bar at the top of the "3" is just the bottom of the crown?
Interesting; this possibility (3 versus Z) was discussed a while back, idon't recall which thread.
Jehan Lhermite on his "Le Passetemps" work mentioned this smith; as also an author i didn't keep record who it was; do i ?
showpost.php
However i don't think the mark on the discussed sword is that of Sebastian Hernandez; but what do i know ...


.
Attached Images
  
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2022, 02:18 PM   #8
Triarii
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 120
Default

Thanks. I'll translate that if possible. Now wondering if it is a C - which for some reason I didn't look at. It's a bit malformed for that letter though.
Triarii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2022, 04:30 PM   #9
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

That was the post i meant.



http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showpo...3&postcount=27
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th July 2022, 02:39 PM   #10
werecow
Member
 
werecow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 553
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fernando View Post
Interesting; this possibility (3 versus Z) was discussed a while back, idon't recall which thread.
Jehan Lhermite on his "Le Passetemps" work mentioned this smith; as also an author i didn't keep record who it was; do i ?
showpost.php
However i don't think the mark on the discussed sword is that of Sebastian Hernandez; but what do i know ...
.
To be honest I just kind of assumed the 3 in the list of makers marks must be a stylized Z because there is a Z in Hernandez and a 3 is a bit meaningless. But I agree it's probably not his mark, as I don't see why it would be mirrored.

But to echo your post, what do I know? }|:oP
werecow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th July 2022, 07:51 PM   #11
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,189
Default

The idea of the stylized '3' at this point for me is a bit out of reach, the image of the punzone is too pixelated for me to make out, also it is clearly much degenerated.
However, the 3 as a mark or element of punzone makers mark in Toledo seems to exist, and not only to Sebastian Hernandez, who has two recorded (59,60). ..but also Ignacio Fernandez (#69). What is puzzling is that it is a number, while many others use capital letters which seem to have nothing to do with the initials of the maker represented.

In the many years I have studied the markings and inscriptions on sword blades, I have of course encountered a great deal of opposition as this topic is far too esoteric for most scholarly attention. It is greatly subjective as these matters were mostly components of occult, magic and secret groups and followings.
Clearly we can only speculate, but it is intriguing to consider the various plausibilities, and occasionally some compelling possibilities have come to light.

With this punzone, as with many, the most reliable perspective is in noting the shape overall, and observing the spurious use of these as often seen. Coupling that with the blade style with comparable period examples is probably the best course.

Interestingly, the use of the number 3, I have seen on the blades of Thomas Gill, a Birmingham, England maker on some of his blades at the forte in the 1780s,90s. This does not seem to correspond to other markings which would suggest any administrative protocols.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2022, 04:22 PM   #12
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,189
Default

I usually take a picture, go to 'PAINT' and use the size reduction feature, then save. This way the pics go from monstrous size to viewable, also making them compatible to the post in the thread.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2022, 04:50 PM   #13
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

A detail to take into consideration is that, the new upload features do not reject too large pictures; only bring them to limit size (1200 bits...). This may cause some inconsistecy among the same series of pictures; maybe some within the lot are smaller (trimmed) and unexpectedely grow bigger by program reflection. Just guessing .
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2022, 05:37 PM   #14
Triarii
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 120
Default

I pasted them into the word doc to try and avoid that. There's two shots of each side of the ricasso.

Another shot attached.
Attached Images
 
Triarii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th December 2022, 10:25 AM   #15
SimonM77
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by werecow View Post
Maybe number 89 or 90 (Sebastian Hernandez)? Although it almost looks like a mirror image. Could the phone have flipped the image perhaps?

Do you know which books these are from?
SimonM77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th December 2022, 11:36 AM   #16
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SimonM77 View Post
Do you know which books these are from?
I think i have already given you an answer on that by email, Simon ; even passed you the Palomares PDF full article !
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th December 2022, 01:33 PM   #17
SimonM77
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fernando View Post
I think i have already given you an answer on that by email, Simon ; even passed you the Palomares PDF full article !
Haha! Thats embarrassing! Sowwy!
SimonM77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.