![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 553
|
![]()
Maybe number 89 or 90 (Sebastian Hernandez)? Although it almost looks like a mirror image. Could the phone have flipped the image perhaps?
Last edited by werecow; 13th July 2022 at 01:09 AM. Reason: Added a thought and an image |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 120
|
![]()
Not sure why they came out so large. They're clearer at a smaller scale like the attachment.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 120
|
![]()
Werecow, the photos are the right way around.
However, although annoyingly I can't get as good a photo as the Mk1 eyeball;
So possibly 89, so possibly Sebastian Hernandez. The text below for No 89 (el viejo Vivia) translates as "the old man lived 1637". I'm not sure if that means 'was active around 1637' or died 1637. That aligns with the hilt type. The text for No 90 (el mozo labro tambien en sevilla) translates as "the young man also worked in Seville". Presumably his earlier mark. Thanks Werecow - I'll look at my other lists of marks to check. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Like so ...
. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 553
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
Jehan Lhermite on his "Le Passetemps" work mentioned this smith; as also an author i didn't keep record who it was; do i ? showpost.php However i don't think the mark on the discussed sword is that of Sebastian Hernandez; but what do i know ... . |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 120
|
![]()
Thanks. I'll translate that if possible. Now wondering if it is a C - which for some reason I didn't look at. It's a bit malformed for that letter though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 553
|
![]() Quote:
But to echo your post, what do I know? }|:oP |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,189
|
![]()
The idea of the stylized '3' at this point for me is a bit out of reach, the image of the punzone is too pixelated for me to make out, also it is clearly much degenerated.
However, the 3 as a mark or element of punzone makers mark in Toledo seems to exist, and not only to Sebastian Hernandez, who has two recorded (59,60). ..but also Ignacio Fernandez (#69). What is puzzling is that it is a number, while many others use capital letters which seem to have nothing to do with the initials of the maker represented. In the many years I have studied the markings and inscriptions on sword blades, I have of course encountered a great deal of opposition as this topic is far too esoteric for most scholarly attention. It is greatly subjective as these matters were mostly components of occult, magic and secret groups and followings. Clearly we can only speculate, but it is intriguing to consider the various plausibilities, and occasionally some compelling possibilities have come to light. With this punzone, as with many, the most reliable perspective is in noting the shape overall, and observing the spurious use of these as often seen. Coupling that with the blade style with comparable period examples is probably the best course. Interestingly, the use of the number 3, I have seen on the blades of Thomas Gill, a Birmingham, England maker on some of his blades at the forte in the 1780s,90s. This does not seem to correspond to other markings which would suggest any administrative protocols. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,189
|
![]()
I usually take a picture, go to 'PAINT' and use the size reduction feature, then save. This way the pics go from monstrous size to viewable, also making them compatible to the post in the thread.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
A detail to take into consideration is that, the new upload features do not reject too large pictures; only bring them to limit size (1200 bits...). This may cause some inconsistecy among the same series of pictures; maybe some within the lot are smaller (trimmed) and unexpectedely grow bigger by program reflection. Just guessing
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 120
|
![]()
I pasted them into the word doc to try and avoid that. There's two shots of each side of the ricasso.
Another shot attached. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 21
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 21
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|