![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,259
|
Re: swords in post #1 - Another tit-bit:
Look at the amount of rings on the hilts, shape of the pommels, etc. 2 single 19thc Tonkin sabres, not made as a pair. (lower one looks to be missing its flat guard disc & is fullered & blade is decorated). They are also too long at 1 metre (40in.) for two handed Thai style. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,512
|
Ren Ren,
Thanks for posting this interesting picture. The hilt on the left-most example is unusual and may well be local to the province you mention, or possibly Cambodian. The second and third are probably Thai, the second being northern Thai/Shan in style and the third seems to be Thai from the Rattanakosin period (early-mid 19th C perhaps). The fourth is Lao in style, and may be quite old. Like many attributions in museums, classification is often by the site of collection rather than the site/culture of manufacture. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 379
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,376
|
Note the same decoration seen on one of your blades, David; could this be called a Guom even in this simple form?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 113
|
Good observation on the ring count difference on the two swords.
I will look up Tonkin sabres, as it’s a new area for me. When the swords arrive, I will take closer pics. Thank you. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|