![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
![]()
Well, I must dissagree with both of you.
That is definetly a 17th century piece (according to Tirri) and I like it verry much, almost totaly of my taste. The darkest piece I've ever seen. Nice clean job. Nice welded steel construction (maybe even wootz the owner will have to ethch it) When I saw it I asked myself if Tirri is selling his collection out, but at a closer look thatone is a little different, from the one in his book, but still enoughly similar that would form a pair. Use as a weapon? Well ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Well all, I have said about its battle use is pure speculation, as I haven't handlle it. Yes SenSei, it could be terrible to handle. ![]() just my 0,02$, but I LIKE IT! I'm really looking forward comments from B.I., Jens, Jim, Lew and other masters of Indian Weapons. P.S.: "I always wanted one of those but one has to set priorities." SenSei, If you have in mind what I know you have, ending on 12 june with a curved blade... It will be a hard master to pupil battle ![]() Last edited by Valjhun; 9th June 2006 at 10:26 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 452
|
![]()
I mean this "hole", not the long gap between the edges. It has no use but only causes the blade get even much weaker against collisions with other blades. (It is already weak enough even without considering that hole, because it is split into two)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
![]()
Yes Erlikhan, I also mean that hole... Immagine a firangi blade getting there and the fast spring aciton of the wielder of the zulfikar...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|