![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Paul,
Sorry for joining the party late and even getting distracted before finalizing this response! Quote:
The hilt does seem to have good age, good quality carving, might well be antique IMHO. The blade is imported as many blades of keris Minang are. The pendokok is of a more modern style. The crosspiece bugs me: Even if possibly stained, it seems to have genuine age. On the other hand, I can't see it as a likely repair attempt; as an original construction it also seems more than odd, especially considering genuine traditional craftsmanship... I believe the gandar and the silverwork might be a later replacement. I'd need to examine this keris personally to substantiate any of these assumptions though. Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 205
|
![]()
Thanks. I do think both handle and scabbard are old. Looks pretty black and dusty from the inside. Notice the wide opening, it indicates that it must have had a blade with a wide ganja (in case the existing blade isn't the first one).
From the back we see that the ivory patch to the right is not in line with the warangka material. So I do not belief it is a broken part. The pendokok looks old from the inside too. I gave it a polish which might give it a new impression. The gandar is a replacement but not surprisingly. Wood is deteriorating soon in a tropical environment. What about this blade? Like Jean's piece it has a silverfoil covered ganja. Does seem to have Malay features to me. Slightly curved. It comes with a Minang dress. Last edited by Paul B.; 6th February 2022 at 10:11 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 205
|
![]()
New suggestions are welcome concerning this keris.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
The selut is Minang but the hilt, blade, and scabbard/ pendok rather look Bugis Riau or Peninsular to me
![]() Other opinions are welcome ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 205
|
![]()
Same observations. Maybe the dress is additional, even if the ganja with silverfoil usually sticks out to demonstrate wealth. Anyway, to me still puzzling.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 205
|
![]()
Meanwhile I know that handle and pendokok have been exchanged by the former owner. Preferably change it with an appropriate pendokok and a more upright handle? What handle would come into your mind Jean?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]() Quote:
![]() However if you prefer, you may fit a smaller East Sumatra pangulu hilt or anak ayam/ pipi teleng hilt, see pics. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 9
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
I don't feel this is anything but Elephant ivory where the sampir is concerned... looking at the hulu, I suspect the same source.
I've a much bigger Sundang sampir with the same external recess seen on the one face. Unlike this example, it is a single piece. This led me to some deeper study some time ago, simply because of the size, I could see no other option other than tusk. Digging in to Sperm whale teeth, the largest sizes and the hollow underside just didn't add up. Here are some images and a good article from which one of the images was drawn from for this thread. Gavin Linky; https://static1.squarespace.com/stat...2020+tusks.pdf |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 207
|
![]()
I agree with Gavins comment. I own a couple of large sperm whale teeth. They are hollow. I cannot see how the hulu can be whale tooth. The scabbard is elephant t me. It is not whale tooth and not bone. The hulu is also likely elephant. Dugong may be a possibility too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Sid,
All teeth that keep growing are hollow and have such a conical pulp cavity. This hilt is way too large for dugong. Given the cementum layer visible on both sides of the hilt (back and base - check first pics), I'd still vote for spermwhale - even if it would need to come from a really huge male... If they had a good chunk for the crosspiece, I just can't fathom why they added additional material on both sides... (On one side only would be less work and look better IMHO.) Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|