![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,670
|
This is an absolutely beautiful sword, and it does not seem we see many of these. The video is excellent as well, as it shows how well this sword responds to handling, it seems very well balanced.
The term spadroon is always confusing as it derives from Italian and German fencing styles using lighter swords, but in England became a fashionable term used for single edge officers swords in 1780s into early 1800. It seems that mostly it is used for stirrup hilt straight sabers of the 'five ball guard' type. These were used 1780s into early 1800s, and became the model for French swords of the type as well as the American eagle head pommel swords into 1820s. The blade appears to be of the regular cavalry backsword forms used from 1770s to 1790s. Obviously of course the ANDREA FERARA markings are spuriously added, but in degree following the convention of that makers named applied to Scottish basket hilt blades in the 17th and 18th centuries. Only physical handling and close up forensic examination can say if the sword and blade are homogenous, but as well balanced as it appears being handled I think optimistically. My only concern is the unusual application of the Andrea Ferara marks. This does not appear to be a heirloom blade from the early basket hilts of the early part of the century, but the notion of adding this marking might well suggest a Scottish officer of cavalry unit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 299
|
Hello Jim,
Thank you for the comments, when the sword arrives I’ll measure it and add the results to this post with photos. However, according to the vendor it does not balance that well with the blade being heavy for the hilt. Regarding the Andrea Farara markings there seems to be a lot of variation on these as they were being added to blades for the Scottish market by Solingen makers by the time this one was made. However I have seen photos of two basket hilt broadswords dating to the mid 18th C. That have a similar shape and markings with the Xs and the name across two sides (with the same orientation). I’m fairly confident that this blade is a few decades older than the hilt the only thing that concerns me in that regard is that it is in very good condition without many of the usual age blemishes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,670
|
Quote:
The ANDREA FERARA blades for Scottish markets began appearing early in the 17th century and remained pretty standard up until Culloden (1746). After that the only 'Scottish' swords were those made for the British army Highland regiments, as they had been produced in garrison towns since early 1700s. Naturally the ANDREA FERARA blades were from Solingen and that mark became a kind of 'brand' to Scottish clients, however they did occur on English blades as well (I have a 'mortuary' c. 1642 with Ferara blade). I share your concerns on the remarkable condition, as well as the character of the Andrea Ferara despite its following earlier configurations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 299
|
Here is a photo of the markings from one of the swords I mentioned earlier:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 299
|
Here are the photos the vendor sent me of the markings plus a couple of the sword
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 299
|
Apologies, I meant to add this one as well:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,670
|
This is more bizarre than I thought. This is a heavy cavalry M1796 sword scabbard of the standard troopers form, also of the 'ladder hilt' pattern carried by officers.
Apparently in little known circumstances which have been remarkably researched by Richard Dellar (author of "The British Cavalry Sword: Some New Perspectives"2013) and presented in his "Did the French National Manufactory at Klingenthal Make British Blades ?" ("Man at Arms" Vol.43, #4, Aug. 2021), there are some interesting possibilities. As the author notes, despite the compelling evidence that some blades were mounted with Klingenthal markings, these may have been Solingen blades may have been acquired from there as surplus after the end of the Runkel enterprise. This was during the post Waterloo occupation of Paris. Several British officers had weapons that needed refurbishing and contacted the Klingenthal works, known for high quality blades. However as they did not have the necessary patterns to produce the British heavy cavalry blades , they used contacts in Solingen to acquire a number of blades. As noted these 'anomalies' have turned up with Klingenthal markings. After this "...other British officers followed suit and ordered replacement blades either as a result of damage or for ENHANCEMENT". Could it be that this blade, which is basically of the width and profile of a heavy cavalry blade of the heavier form of 1796 for combat, was made at Klingenthal or in France in this situation ? If being commissioned privately for 'enhancement' the Andrea Ferara might have been so placed. Clearly this is a tenuous suggestion, but the remarkable evidence in the Richard Dellar article offers compelling plausibility. These swords all have such stories to tell! This image (from MDL, for informational purposes only, not in stock) is the M1796 heavy cavalry officers 'honeysuckle' or 'ladder' hilt noted., Last edited by Jim McDougall; 9th October 2021 at 05:20 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|