![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 EAAF Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Nov 2004 
				Location: Upstate New York, USA 
				
				
					Posts: 970
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Having had the privilege of handling a number of medieval swords, authentic and not, I must concur with cornelistromp's statement above. Though the statistics strongly point in the unfortunate direction whenever the question is asked, as a practical matter I almost never can decide authenticity with adequate certainty from images alone and I do not wish to risk condemning the authentic with a 'knee-jerk' denunciation based on statistical probabilities. My own collecting days are probably over owing to old age and those discouraging statistics. The reproductions these days may be so proficiently prepared that I expect, more and more, old publicly published evidence of provenance, preferably with illustration, will become increasingly critical in setting a comfort level.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | |
| 
			
			 Arms Historian 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Route 66 
				
				
					Posts: 10,670
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 I totally concur with Jasper and Lee, the odds of this being genuine are profoundly slim and the industrious 'charlatans' who manufacture 'copies' have become too good. This has confounded the efforts of those of us who wish to study the history of these weapons, and taken away the potential for true scholars and collectors to own the actual weapons from those times. Lee, I am with you on collecting days being over, with old age and diminished resources that may be gone, but research and learning never stops ![]() Fortunately you had the wonderful experiences of collecting and actually knowing Mr. Oakeshott personally, which gave us the amazing resource you, he and Mr.Pierce produced, "Swords in the Viking Age". With these references we can still learn on these swords.,  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2021 
				Location: New Zealand 
				
				
					Posts: 84
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			While the folded pommel is odd I feel it could argue in the direction of authenticity. When iron and steel where rare and valuable smiths would do what ever they could to reuse waste pieces, whereas today a forger will simply select an appropriate piece of bar from stock. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	The fact that folded pommels are uncommon argues that a forger wouldn't go to the effort of making one if it would detract from the "authenticity" of the piece. Robert  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |