![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 411
|
![]()
Very nice kaskara. I read somewhere that the type of rings on the scabbard are old. This is opposed to the round ones on most 20th C. pieces. This suggests that the scabbard could be original to the sword although it otherwise is in good shape. But without the cape & top band, likely silver. Others may be able to date the rings better.
Ed |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 61
|
![]()
blades 3.2cm wide at base , interested if any idea of blade it came from if European , its more like the heavy Swedish blades of the 1800s in size, thickness and length. Yes the leathers very thin and fragile, its a concern handling to be honest
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 409
|
![]()
I think it is a locally made blade (albeit in a european style). I think the work around the ricasso and what looks like inconsistency in the width of the fuller are too loose to be european, especially C19 european.
Regards Richard |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,116
|
![]() Quote:
3.2 cm is a damn wide blade, so I suggest a repurposed cavalry blade, possibly even a 1796 British heavy cavalry blade. Old British blades ended up in many places far away from home. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1796_Heavy_Cavalry_Sword |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,708
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|