![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 252
|
![]()
Looks like it started life as an Indian combined matchlock and axe. The Royal armouries example dates it vaguely 1700 to 1800. Worth looking to see if their is any sign the remains of a rivit to the tiller that could have supported the serpentine.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 157
|
![]()
Thank you for your comment Raf. There is now sign of a rivet to the tiller. The tiller doesn't look strong enough to support an ax either.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 252
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 534
|
![]()
Attached from my archive
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 252
|
![]()
Thanks Marcus. Certainly looks like a tiller to me. One option might be it was designed to be fired from a rowlock fixed to the bow of a camel saddle in which case the tiller makes sense. There is a discussion of camel mounted guns in a thread started by Ibrahim Al Balooshi June 10 2016.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
Interesting suggestion. But from a purely functional standpoint, would such a fixture be necessary for a weapon of relatively small caliber such as this? Oarlock swivels were commonly employed for bigger weapons such as lantakas (and their European counterparts such as berços), amusettes, and the like where bulk and recoil were factors to contend with.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|