![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,189
|
![]() Quote:
The WO on the blade would represent 'war office' , the appellation used for the Board of Ordnance after 1855. With the VR and those initials, it would appear that this blade was from a machete issued to other ranks by the British government, post 1855. It would seem likely that these machetes were certainly issued for colonial use in highly vegetal regions, so there are a number of possibilities. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wirral
Posts: 1,204
|
![]()
I am positive that this has been made from a reshaped English export machete blade . I have had over the years several of these machetes with crowned VR and even crowned ( Georgian ) GR on the blade. These markings I recall reading are spurious and were simply added to enhance the perceived quality of the item in the eyes of potential overseas buyers , rather than denoting ex British military service . Because of the high price which attracts to large 'Confederate' bowies these machete blades seem to be the basis of many an unscrupulous forgers fare. Despite the VR on the blade , the makers name and address on one's I have had appear to be in a much more modern font.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wirral
Posts: 1,204
|
![]()
Here are 2 'royally' marked machetes I used to own , neither of which I believe to be as old as they purport to be .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: upstate South Carolina
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Thanks for your input. I also think this knife began life as a machete.The machetes in your photo do not appear to have other markings. This blade seems to have at least one row of lettering? and perhaps two rows. I have not been able to make out any letters with the exception of an "O" and maybe a "W". Have you seen any machete's of this type with lettering? If needed, I can post other photos, but the lettering is not any clearer in them. Thanks again for your reply.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|