![]()  | 
	
		
			
  | 
	|||||||
![]()  | 
	
	
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | 
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2021 
				
				
				
					Posts: 70
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thank you Dmitry for your opinion, there are enough absurdities in the subject, which of course are visible to me, which is why I showed it here. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	with respect  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2021 
				
				
				
					Posts: 70
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			however, there is something that makes you want to figure it out to the end, 
		
		
		
			At first ; the rust on it was a real, thick, strong crust, as in the first photos, and it was removed on its own. Secondly; the blades on both sides are clogged, dull, but inside the cross-pieces they remain (seen in the photo). third; I had previously thought that it was shortened, the longitudinal rib could not initially reach the tip. fourthly; it is not completely cleaned, it must probably be soaked, different things can be seen at different angles of illumination, but they are partially still under a layer of unfinished substance,. ,,, But in general, yes, it does not look right, I agree. with respect.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2021 
				
				
				
					Posts: 70
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I wanted to add to the previous post, 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	in the structure itself there is so much unnecessary non-technological work, this is a stiffener, this crosspiece of the guard, everything is done difficult, if you look from today's time, I am very grateful for your attention to the topic ... with respect  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2021 
				
				
				
					Posts: 70
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 But take a closer look at this (not ordinary / not correct at first glance) Scandinavian sword of the 13th century. photo taken from the site CZERNY'S INTERNATIONAL AUKTION HOUSE S.r. 1. (in the context of the post). with respect Last edited by Elmereya; 27th March 2021 at 11:29 PM.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2021 
				
				
				
					Posts: 70
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			good afternoon. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	I want to thank everyone who expressed their opinion in this old topic. Based on the material that I showed then, in general, the item was assessed exactly as it looks in the photos that were shown, adequately seen ..  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2021 
				
				
				
					Posts: 70
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I want to share in the continuation of this topic, the result of what eventually turned out after clearing, the surface has rather deep traces of damage and therefore it is rather difficult to choose the right angle of illumination, but in my opinion if you look closely you can see the remains of old letters, there are four such places,
		 
		
		
		
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2021 
				
				
				
					Posts: 70
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			the remnants of a long inscription are visible, the central part of which is specially damaged.
		 
		
		
		
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |