![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,906
|
![]() Quote:
Here below they are! The first curve defines a concavity of the edge, the second a convexity. So I think it IS a "sossun patah" or however it is spelled correctly. However, the blade is somehow different from the classic sossun patah because it appears that the blade was recurved in later stages of its making. ![]() Last edited by mariusgmioc; 12th February 2021 at 08:22 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,361
|
![]()
I too think this is a recurved blade, but it does not resemble any other sossun patah I've seen.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Vlissingen, Netherlands
Posts: 71
|
![]()
I don't believe we can consider this a Sosun Pattah. The Kopis form of the blade from the Sosun can be distinguished in two forms, the Indo-Islamic and the Hindu basket form. The Indo Islamic form is shaped like a willow leaf, hence the name Sosun Pattah in Urdu.
The Hindu basket hilted Sosun has a more crude curve, but a downward curve in the middle section of the blade. Both have chopping type of blade with a center of gravity to make it suitable for chopping. A similar idea of blade construction can be found on the Nepalese Kukri. Your blade's middle section is facing upwards which can be more seen as an Indian made type Yataghan. Regards, Peter |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,361
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
![]() Quote:
Thank you, Ian. The site in question does list the website in text on the images themselves. I could obscure this address by editing the image. However, I appreciate Atzi making an archive of past sold items available for research, so I don't want to use those images without proper attribution. The text is written under the item in the image, and there is no hyperlink. Would posting these be acceptable? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 187
|
![]()
G'day Guys,
I have a British sword circa 1815 with a recurved blade, similar to this one. My blade is a pipe-back and is 80cm long. The intent of the design seems to be to provide a curved cutting edge, with the point more inline for easier thrusting. Initially I had thought that perhaps the officer commissioned this sword based on similar blades he had seen in India, but until now hadn't seen any similar blades. In most sossun patahs, the final curve which brings the point back up is much shorter and the point is nowhere near inline with the hilt. Thanks for posting this. Cheers, Bryce |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
![]()
Bryce - I have thought the SAME thing. The recurve brings the point up into alignment with the grip to facilitate a thrust. That said, a typical sabre typically has the point in line with the grip, too, so I'm not sure this alone explains this design. I also thought that, perhaps, the ergonomics change if the user were on horseback thrusting/slashing at a target standing on the ground. While that may be true for the example you shared, the diminutive size of the example from this thread makes me think this was not a cavalry weapon. Again, I may well be wrong. Still, it is nice tho know my line of thinking is not too divergent from others on here. Reassuring to me, perhaps concerning to you!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|