![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Eastern Sierra
Posts: 517
|
David, it might be crushed but with the angle of the photo I can't be sure. My eye for evaluation is still developing. As far as repair goes, I guess I tend to fix things, even things that aren't worth fixing. My friends actually make fun of me for the habit and the time I lose, but sometimes the results can't be duplicated by something new. Most of the silver mendaks I've seen online seem to be in Bali's style.
Last edited by Interested Party; 20th January 2021 at 02:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,258
|
Quote:
I won't provide any links to mendaks for sale online because that would break our rules, but if you just google "mendak keris" you will no doubt find many opinions for Javanese mendaks. I can be fairly certain the mendak on this keris has indeed been crushed flat because Javanese and Madurese mendaks have more width to them than what i can see. I cannot be sure of the exact style this mendak is, as there are many variations, but this mendak probably looked something like the one i have posted below. Bali keris rings are called uwer (or wewer) btw, though sometimes they are misidentified as "mendak". But my point here goes even a bit beyond whether or not you can restore this mendak (though i seriously doubt you could get a very good result), but more the idea that giving the blade a new mendak could be seen as something of a gift to MM's newly acquired keris, an honouring to the spirit of the keris and an acknowledgement of new ownership. Keris dress is often changed when a keris changes hands. It's just a matter of a different perspective i guess. Of course, if you are up for the challenge you could always exchange info with MM and he could send you this mendak so you can see what you can do with it. I'd love to see you be successful with such a project in spite of my doubts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,237
|
Hello David,
This new mendak looks "die casted". Is that correct ? Not much of a gift to a very old an genuine keris as presented in this thread. I really prefer old mendak, as they are indeed like a jewel, a gift to the keris. Ps, I like this thread about mendak : http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...=madura+mendak Last edited by David; 27th January 2021 at 03:19 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 6
|
Thank you all for the comments. I think I will replace the mendak with one that radiates more...."bling" :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,258
|
Quote:
Yes, i grabbed the first shot i could find on the internet in order to show I.P. the general shape of a Jawa/Madura mendak so that he could better understand why i was convinced that the one on this keris is squashed flat. It was not meant as an example of an exquisite or even medium grade mendak. That said however, it would be far better than leaving the one that is presently on this keris in place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
Hello David,
This mendak which you showed us is in bejen style from Yogya (see Keris Jawa book page 281) so not really suitable for this kris... ![]() Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,258
|
Quote:
As i just explained to Asomotif, i was simply posting a any Jawa/Madura style mendak to demonstrate that the one on the OP's keris was squashed. This is an Eat Javanese keris and Max should seek a mendak that is more appropriate for this kind of keris. Of course, from what i can see of what is left of the mendak on the keris in question, it does not look like it was the proper mendak to begin with. Which is why i wrote " I cannot be sure of the exact style this mendak is, as there are many variations, but this mendak probably looked something like the one i have posted below." So please excuse my laziness for not researching proper East Jawa mendaks suitable for this ensemble, but that was not my intended point at the time. If max would like to find a mendak more suitable for this ensemble he should probably be looking for ones in these variations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
Yes David, these are very good and suitable pieces! I intended to show some pieces but did'nt as I got very few spares
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|