![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
Merry Ho Ho!
Nice toys under that tree! On the parapat I wonder if there was hair originally on the ends, like in some Kutai hilts. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,453
|
![]() Quote:
Hi Jose, At the ends of the forked hilt, they didn't attach hair. They worn the sword like showed on the photo. 'naked'. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,453
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Glad you clarified that one, Maurice...
![]() ![]() ![]() Jose, Kutai & Modang are quite different cultures. You'll note that the tip of the branch is carved conically to help in attaching (and arranging) the short hair decorating these tips (a bit like a brush). This won't work with the carving of most parapat/perepet prongs. Since the prongs are pointing upwards, long hair would be quite awkward. There is a single example with long hair in our archives (in an example with missing prongs); I'd tend to believe that this was the result of an ill-informed restoration attempt though. Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|