![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Maybe it's "Keraton-style"?
At hotels you can also purchase a night in the President's Suite without being a President... ![]() Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 940
|
![]()
hhhmmmm......
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 63
|
![]()
Thanks Alam for sharing
Since I’m the seller of these keris I try to give you some insight of what I know about the items. a. The description of the Keris is accurate when it comes to age, material etc. So the first one mentioned is indeed with silver cover and both are indeed of the age mentioned (at least). I don’t see the point in deliberately misleading people, as you might see in other auctions. You can clearly see from the pictures that these pendok are old, and they are indeed. b. Origin or makers information isn’t always available, so I stick with what I have. Both keris came from Yogja and where described as such. The silver pendok could have been from Solo, but fortunately I have a Pedang Sabet with similar silver carved scabbard, coming from Yogja as well. Therefore it became Yogja. c. Regarding the handle. My blades are being sold as is. Meaning that I kept all as much as original. A Yogja keris with solo hilt is not uncommon, some of my java blades even came with madura hilts. Since blades obviously survive longer, it isn’t so strange to find these combinations. (and I’m sure you are aware of that) d. The title contains the word Keraton, but the description itself points in what way its used. I think it’s very clear. I’m seriously scaling down a large part of the blades I have. eBay is a usefull channel to share my items with others. Since these are nice keris, I’m very sure the new owners of these blades are happy as well. (just check the ending prices). |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
Hi doecon,
Thank you for responding. What I meant was (and still is), for the 1st piece was it owned by a palace guard? And for the 2nd piece, was it a keraton commissioned piece, or ever used at the keraton? ![]() My response to your comments: a) Material-wise, I guess it's specified adequately... b) So, it's more of assumption, is it? c) "Therefore it became Yogja." you mean attribution can be changed from Solo to Yogya? For the Solo hilt, for common keris use, perhaps. But for palace guard or keraton piece, why would a Solo hilt be used? d) Are you implying that pieces which have the keraton word or insignia, are keraton pieces? If the provenance is not true or based solely on assumptions, then it should be stated otherwise. When an absolute term is used when it's only an assumption, wouldn't it be misleading? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 63
|
![]()
Ok Alam, I will try to answer;
a) Yes, agreed b) Yes, it can be called an assumption. If I would know where Wuryadara Karyapa lived it wouldn’t be (see name description on the back). c) Was b) see before. And yes the description mentioned that the handle was probably added later. Now idea why a solo style hilt was used. d) I’m not implying anything. The title mentioned the word Keraton, the description explains why. Of course I’m not assuming that all keris dressed in pendok with keraton insigne are actually being Keraton keris. I don’t see I said anything like that ? However, regarding older pendok (1800’s with fine silver carving work in this case) I think its save to believe that there is a link between the holder of the keris and the Keraton. In case a seller gives wrong information with the purpose of increasing the “value” of his items, I would call it misleading (please do compare our descriptions with others). I’m being pretty much straightforward about my blades, I don’t lie about age or material used. So if something is old we will add that, if something is new or recent, you will clearly see that in the descriptions. On top of that I try to put as many pictures as possible, so everybody can see for themselves. Regarding origin and provenance we can’t always be sure. For most blades complete information about former owners is missing, simply unknown or unclear. In my opinion it can not be called “misleading” in case you try to fill in some information about the items history. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||||||||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
Hi doecon,
No issues with a) ![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thank you for responding. |
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 79
|
![]()
Bottom line is: Caveat Emptor
With regard to kerises, it depends on how much of a purist and/or traditionalist you are. Given the history of Solo/Surakarta and Yogayakarta, starting from the 'split', a purist steeped in tradition would never mix the two. Madura hilts on kerises from other areas may be due to: - Madurese were often used as soldiers in Java and other areas - Large Madurese communities settled in areas outside Madura - A lot of people consider Madurese hilts. like Palembang hilts and Bugis hilts to be the best in the region. Unless you personally have the wherewithal, it's safer to rely on people you have come to trust or their referrals. Regards. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 79
|
![]() Quote:
The bit on Madura hilts shouldn't have been included ![]() Once again, my apologies. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
Agreed, afaik. Caveat Emptor is normally the approach. But that still does not answer the question: Are these Keraton or Palace Guard pieces? What is your opinion Pangeran? Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|