![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
Quote:
I beg to differ. Those pictured, 265, 267, the cutting is on the inside curve. All those I've owned and sold of that particular type from Betel nut size to sword size and those still with me, this is the case too, the edge is on the inner curve. Of all those pictured, these two, 265 & 267 are the exception where blade orientation is concerned. Charles should be able to chime in on these two in the book, he's owned and sold the type too. I recall one he sold from the 4th April 2018. Seek out one of my past sold listings, Sold item s1504. I don't believe I can provide my own links here Gavin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,523
|
Hi Gavin,
You may be correct. My experience with these klewang is different. Since Albert v. Zonneveld is a member of this forum, he might be able to tell us how his pictures are oriented. Ian |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 70
|
Ahhhhhhh….its like a Lopah and Panabas had a forbidden baby, and that baby is a boy…with ballz, well a ball technically. Grip curvature is gentler than in the lopahs and has an extended pommel area, while lopahs are mostly thinning to a point, ring band decoration is also common to the quality panabas…very mini panabas-ish if you ask me. Love that hilt bling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 70
|
on another note, a similar piece has been posted here back in 2009 on this thread. See pic and link included. Blade point is different and pommel is slightly different, but maybe wear or break on the blade and sheath adopted later.
Origin theory in that thread negates my panabas guess lol. Hope this helps. http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ht=sacrificial Last edited by Aleksey G.; 26th June 2020 at 06:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,523
|
A larger klewang, but with scabbard of similar style to the subject of this thread appears in the "Sold" section on the Oriental Arms site. This one is labeled as a South Sumatran klewang.
. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
Thanks Ian,
That scabbard is almost "shaver cool"... yep I said it far too modern to gauge origins IMHO, perhaps a form seen all over the island I feel there is mostly agreement on Sumatra at least. You noted from the image you present were the edge is on these types? Attached is a very fine Aceh example with an original old scabbard found in the MET. A northern scabbard phenomenon too. Gavin
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|