|
|
|
13th June 2020, 11:54 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 435
|
here are some better close up detail pics, have a look at the leather , reproductions never have leather like this.
Please post some similar pictures including the grips, it seems they are plain wood. |
|
|
|
13th June 2020, 06:20 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 15
|
The problem is that for higher quality pictures the forum says they are too big...
|
|
|
|
|
13th June 2020, 07:54 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 233
|
Quote:
I'll try to resize them in a way that will preserve the quality. Also, outside pictures under natural light will help. |
|
|
|
|
|
13th June 2020, 08:02 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
14th June 2020, 05:16 PM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 233
|
Better pictures of Luka's sword. My take is the blade is old and good. Pommel newer. Undecided on the hilt.
Last edited by CSinTX; 14th June 2020 at 05:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
14th June 2020, 06:12 PM
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 233
|
more pics
|
|
|
|
|
14th June 2020, 06:21 PM
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 15
|
CSinTX, thank you very much!
|
|
|
|
|
14th June 2020, 06:33 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
14th June 2020, 06:56 PM
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 435
|
Casey is right , the blade is indeed good no doubt , it was good to send better pictures, it dit had recent surface rust that's all.
The pommel I can't say for sure but it could be good , the same for the crossguard that has to much paint on it to be sure but its made in the 17th c manner. the crossguard is made crude, but with this type of sword the originals always are, to refined would be suspicious. At auction the description would be : a 17th C two handed sword in good condition. I would be interesting to see the same detailed pics of the other sword if you would like to share them. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
