![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
Certainly not like nowadays, in that they use a bulletless cartridge containing propellant gas ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 369
|
Quote:
I guess the gun was charged with powder into the first section smaller diameter of the barrel and then the stem of the grenade/missile is designed to match the larger diameter of the barrel and is pushed right down on top of the charge. Marcus's post 3 gives a good impression. CC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
My imagination ? .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,242
|
I think that they used an appropriate charge of powder that was big enough to expel the stick with the grenade. But honestly said I would'nt hold that gun in my hands and press it against my shoulder firing it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 369
|
Quote:
But not as bad as the Nock Volley gun that fired all seven barrels at the same time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,242
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|