![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,294
|
Thanks for your comments. I thought that the stamp might have been placed on the scabbard afterward because it is on a rounded edge which would have been removed(the stamp), had it been there before they shaped the sheath.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,378
|
The marking appears to be burnt into the wood.
I have not been able to find an anchor device with a caduceus wrapped around the stock as this one is. It also looks like multiple impressions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
Quote:
This is not a caduceus but a rope. It was stamped twice. I saw this sign a the back of Chinese ceramics for the East India company but i dont remember where... To me it's a good sign of age... really cool... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,294
|
Great different perspectives!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,378
|
Interesting indeed.
Most fouled anchor devices have the shank and flukes entwined along with the stock. What is the size of the impression? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,294
|
7/8" x 3/8"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,294
|
This picture somewhat looks like the one on the scabbard.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|