![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 108
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,141
|
![]()
Hello Ibrahiim and good to hear from you. Well, you do have a point there. Hard to tell without the item in hand (yes, I know. The ole fall-back
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
Just because it's crude doesn't mean it's not 'original'.
see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVL46CM9k80 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SY_GYDq-nJY |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,141
|
![]()
Point well taken, Wayne. It's just so hard to say with these type pieces. A blacksmith-made weapon and primitive nature is not what's in question. I think Ibrahiim's point is a question of actual age and usage. This piece has potential for both being a legit item versus a mock-up.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 334
|
![]()
Something to take in consideration: 'sail' hilt daggers were mostly high-end objects, meaning the fit & finish on them were taken with effort and precision.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|