![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Interesting item indeed, Phil ...
Indeed a piece that falls into the 'usual unusual' items. Meaning that here and there, composites of this kind pop up, regardless of their non massive proliferation. Take French Dumonthier, who used to come in the market with variations on knife pistols, some embellished to a high end grade. Also we can see examples as sophisticated as the barrel and blade being made in one only piece. Thinking of Jim's suggestion for this possibly been a setup made in Afghanistan, due to their duplication ability, i notice technical details that would never cross my mind would be object of their 'skilled' smiths attention, namely the Liege type engraving on the cylinder, the way screws are inset on the stock and the preoccupation to stamp an assembly number (#4) in all parts. Also interesting that we can see out there (in a blog) a rusted example similar (equal) to the one posted, said to be found in a remote land, under the skeleton of a pirate. Go figure ! PS Oh, i didn't see that Jim meanwhile came in with further considerations! . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 413
|
![]()
The old East India Company mark was a "4" surmounting a heart. This could explain in being adopted by local manufactures as a mark of "quality" in some instances.
Regards Richard |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,467
|
![]()
Richard, exactly what I was just researching, and had thought perhaps that suggestion might be a bit tenuous, so Im glad I was not alone!!
![]() The East India Company of course had the heart and VEIC letters quartered with a cross atop. This was of course in line with the well known globe and cross used in marking arms and many items with its Christian connotations. With the EIC the mark with the cross was intended as a balemark to identify and as a kind of protective amulet mark. With trade to India, it has often been claimed that the cross was altered by adding a line, into a four, to avoid offending or concerning the Muslim trade partners. These EIC markings were of course well known throughout India, and in the Anglo-Afghan war of 1839 the markings became prevalent from the locks of the Brown Bess muskets captured by Afghans. The use of these EIC hearts which were topped with a '4' became popular with Afghans using the locks from these guns through the century to fashion their own jezails. Tribal people tend to see such images symbolically rather than of course their original meaning in the context of origin, and may have seen the '4' as a mark of quality or protective imbuement. They likely disregarded the EIC heart as of course an element of British aggression, much in the way Tipu defaced the mark on his cannons adding his own over them. Purely speculative, but as Richard has observed, a reasonably plausible idea. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,467
|
![]()
Fernando, I just saw your considerations as well, good examples, thank you!
To my suggestion that pepperbox revolvers were known in Afghanistan and thus duplicated is seen in this Afghan made interpretation, with the usual added decoration typically on jezails. As noted Phil's example does seem to be a Belgian made pepperbox . Last edited by Jim McDougall; 7th August 2019 at 07:28 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
And while i still consider this to be an European (Belgian) born pistol, i will also have to admit that the blade has undeniable Asian traces. Would be a far too long shot thinking that this pistol had its disassembly screw lever modified to support a cut down talwar blade ... either before departure from origin workshop or afterwards, as per owner's design ? On the other hand, it would be interesting to know from Phil which particular parts are marked with the "4"; if not for something else, still good for perusal. . |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 57
|
![]()
FWIW, I reviewed my copy of Blades and Barrels, and there is only one pepperbox sword in the book. It was made by Robert Lawton under US Patent number 481, and it does not resemble your sword.
There are several other revolver swords in the book, but not similar to yours. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 61
|
![]()
Goodness , artillery 1832 sword blade on that example .
ill check on the '4' stamps when i get home tonight and post cheers Phil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|