![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
The blade fits quite well into the wrongko, the gandar was probably replaced indeed but it is not visible. I am not familiar with this style of nice pendok.
There seems to be some tiny writings on the gilt deer on one side? The naga and carvings look younger than the blade itsef (naga body especially) but it may be just an impression. Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
I don't think so, Jean. The blade exhibiting the pamor just got (over-)cleaned and etched recently.
Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 421
|
![]() Quote:
On the deer, it's just fine line features that in my opinion are meant to represent the fur of the animal. The body of the naga has been designed since the manufacture of the blade (I think) because it's very raised compared to the "flat" of the blade. And thank you all for yours comments. ![]() Last edited by Athanase; 7th July 2019 at 10:18 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,237
|
![]() Quote:
As to the fit, i have found that even some Jawa keris have blades that sometimes sit a little bit "proud" in their sheaths. In your case i simple allow that to be the case rather then forcing the blade to seat deeper in the opening, especially given the residual kinatah which you are quite likely to further chip away at if you keep forcing the blade into place. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|