![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 102
|
I have uploaded some more images.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 36
|
Regarding guard additions and perforations I share two I've had with those features (hopefully I can attach the photos correctly):
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 54
|
The half guard is not found to often,i always felt that it was a transitional variation
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,680
|
Quote:
Hi Edward, That is a most reasonable observation, but in many ethnographic forms, especially in India, there is typically not a linear progression in hilt development, or at least that can be defined accurately. Most weapon forms are very traditional, and take from early types, but often with subtle and often very regional or sometimes personal preference features. The 'tulwar' (with 'Indo Persian' hilt) for example, often has certain features which some have tried to characterize regionally, or into periods, but this has proven mostly futile. In most cases such things are accomplished by looking into decoration aspects. In the case of these half guards, it would seem as has been shown, that there was certain favor toward these kinds of hilt elements which were seen on some of the 'chilanum' type daggers. It is not uncommon to see such transfer of dagger hilt styles (invariably personal) to full size swords in cases to more personalize them as well. I suppose what I am trying to say is that in India, variation was not unusual with traditional hilt forms which were in use for centuries with no notable changes in a progressive style overall. That is perhaps what is so exciting and challenging about identifying them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 54
|
Does this show a timeline on hilts,Maybe I think in the early swords you can see changes over 2 or 3 hundred years.depending on the type of use the sword would have the hilt would change.Their are not that many half guard swords around so they may have come from a single area or just made for very few that wanted half guard protection or the just didn't the the rub of full guard on their hip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
I agree with Jim: there were 2 main tendencies with Indian handles: one purely local/tribal, and we indeed have major difficulties pinpointing their places of origin, and another, with merging of local variants with influences from another culture. IMHO, Tulwar with a side guard belongs to the latter. I have some of those, too. Again, pure IMHO, the most logical place for such collision would be Deccan.
Your archaic ones likely belong to the third group that is almost unique and where Rawson might have been correct: local progression of Old Indian into full-blown Khanda form. The D- guard of the latter was likely influenced by the European examples, but the solid shield-like guard might have been a completion of the archaic double-wing construction I an skating on a very, very thin ice here, but the advantage of this Forum is our ability to express half-baked preliminary ideas and adjust them according to critical comments. Our entries here are not a real book, where everything needs to be researched to the minute comma. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
Here is another Patissa. Western India. Probably late 15th century. Total length 100 cm, blade length 89 cm. See cat. pp. 350-353.
Last edited by Jens Nordlunde; 1st July 2019 at 01:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
Here is another picture.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|