Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 7th June 2019, 05:34 AM   #1
David Gallas
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 24
Default

You're welcome Alan.
David Gallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2019, 06:09 AM   #2
jagabuwana
Member
 
jagabuwana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 290
Default

Alan - what about this gonjo makes it unacceptable to be classified as Tuban?

From having seen the photo and before having read further, Tuban was my guess. My reasoning was the rounded sirah cicak and the buntut urang tapering to a point.
jagabuwana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2019, 07:28 AM   #3
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,989
Default

If this gonjo had what we call nguceng mati form, with the tail coming back to a distinct point, I would be prepared to accept the slightly pointed sirah cecak as Tuban, its not really rounded enough for Tuban, but it would pass with a push. However, that gonjo tail has a slight curve and the end is more or less squared off. This is not acceptable for Tuban.

There's another thing too, I cannot really see the blade cross section, I'm not sure if it is ovoid enough for Tuban, in a couple of pics it looks like it could be slightly raised down the mid-line of the wilah, not really an ada-ada, but not rounded either.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2019, 09:10 AM   #4
Jean
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
Default

I wonder whether this gonjo wulung is original, look at the mating with the blade and the neat & oversized hole around the pesi with a rustic wedge?
Regards
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2019, 09:50 AM   #5
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,989
Default

The gonjo might not be original, but this is an old blade, and gonjos on old blades are often not original, the gonjo itself is old, the erosion seems to be more or less similar to the wilah erosion, the wedge is quite OK, the hole in the pesi could be a whisker smaller, but if the gonjo was removed during maintenance, something that is not at all unusual with older blades, natural erosion would account for the larger than necessary hole.

I can see nothing in this keris to cause me to question it, I'd accept as is, even if the gonjo was not the gonjo put onto it on day one --- and there is no way of knowing that with any certainty in the case of this keris.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2019, 08:06 PM   #6
Jean
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
Default

Just for reference and comparison, I attach the pics of the sorsoran of 3 old & big blades similar to David's blade (dapur Tilam Upih) with original gonjos I think.
Regards
Attached Images
   

Last edited by Jean; 17th June 2019 at 08:46 AM.
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2019, 12:24 AM   #7
Athanase
Member
 
Athanase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 417
Default

Hello,
I received today a big Kriss with a strong blade of 45cm long.
I hesitate also between the north of Java or East Java.
The dapur is similar but with greneng.
I'll be posting photos this weekend.
Athanase is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.