![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,989
|
![]()
I am not able to classify this blade from a photo. The gonjo is not acceptable as Tuban, it has West Jawa elements, and elements seen in extreme East Coast Jawa gonjos. The same is true of the wilah itself.
Javanese, yes, more likely than not, but from a photo I can go no further. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 24
|
![]()
Thank you for your replay Mr Maisey. The east Javanese option could be very plausible. Because the last owner from Indonesia was Madurese from east Java. The keris was discussed here by some specialists and they classified it as PB 9 Solo, what i doubted...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,989
|
![]()
David, I cannot confidently give a classification (tangguh) for this big blade from a photo, but I can very confidently say what it is not, and it is most definitely not a Surakarta blade. Not one single tell relates to Surakarta.
Where are these experts who think it is Surakarta located David? Incidentally, "Alan" will do just fine. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 24
|
![]()
In Holland, i live in Holland...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,989
|
![]()
Thank you David.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 24
|
![]()
You're welcome Alan.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 290
|
![]()
Alan - what about this gonjo makes it unacceptable to be classified as Tuban?
From having seen the photo and before having read further, Tuban was my guess. My reasoning was the rounded sirah cicak and the buntut urang tapering to a point. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|