![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ireland
Posts: 543
|
![]()
Hi Mel and Corrado26
Thanks for interest and Corrado26 you have found a v close match few differences but overall construction V similar. Mel The barrel narrows about an half an inch from the nipple to a v small diameter of maybe 4 mm or so but i am unsure if there is a chamber behind the constriction or not there otherwise a uniform diameter for the remainder of the barrel Thinking about the weapon it is v concealable and might have been designed to be used with or without the barrel attachment. ie a short or long ranged weapon the absence of shoulder stock attachment though is awkward. but resting on a wall or fence would negate this difficultly regards Ken |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: North East England.
Posts: 107
|
![]()
My first thoughts were that it was feasible that it was intended for dual use, that's what prompted my query about the diameter of the breech and its capacity to hold a shot or ball as well as the powder.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|