![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
Thanks. Wow, it's pretty worn but I bet what remains says "London". Too bad there isn't more to it.
I agree that it's quite long for a regulation musket, and not massive enough nor large of bore to be a rampart-gun which certainly would have had a military role. If it's indeed London-made, perhaps a forum colleague who is more familiar with British gunmakers and their marks can look at it, and from context, tell you more about the piece. Do you have Pollard's History of Firearms (1983 edn) Claude Blair was the general editor of this very informative and well illustrated anthology of articles covering the subject from beginnings to the present, with chapters proceding century-by-century. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Chino, CA.
Posts: 219
|
![]()
Looks like a fowler too me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,116
|
![]()
Could it be African trade gun? These were made up into the early 20th century, usually in Belgium, and often with spurious stamps and markings.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|