![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 210
|
![]() Quote:
n2s |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
Hi Ariel,
The "Swords for Sea Service" volumes I guess became sort of standard reference for British regulation swords over 20 years ago when I was involved in that sector of collecting. The Gilkerson book is actually recent and also from London. Thanks very much for the compliment ![]() All the best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 607
|
![]()
IMHO, this piece has nothing to do with naval dirks, aside from similar silhouettes. Nor do I see any attempts to emulate period naval dirks in its composition.
As for its proper and definite provenance, I'm afraid I don't have much input. To me it looks like a fantasy piece, perhaps from the Middle East. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 51
|
![]()
Just going by the dimensions of the handle (that may accomodate a hand 2.5 inches wide), and looking at the finger-grips, this would seem to be a sword for a child. Even tulwar disc-pommel grips, which are very small, are bigger than this. On a different tack, "minature" swords are known from Europe to Mexico, for cadets, for hunting (as an aristocratic past-time) and status etc.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|