![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,369
|
![]()
Hi Rob,
I seriously doubt that these were intended for military use. If we look at WWII-era dha, they were fairly plain with plaited rattan strips holding the scabbards together, and similar strips on their plain wooden hilts. Dha, as legitimate fighting weapons, were largely replaced by guns by the mid- to late-19th C. The dha continued mainly as a large, general purpose, "bush knife." Everything about the pair you show suggests 20th C manufacture, which is well after the dha was used as a primary weapon. The materials suggest relatively inexpensive swords that are fully functional, but may have been reduced to ceremonial/display functions at the time they were made. Ian. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 539
|
![]()
Hi Ian,
Thanks for the info. If I manage to get a translation, I will post what I am told. Sincerely, RobT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|